[Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court: Xu Guoli’s suspected intentional homicide case opens on May 14]
On July 5, 2020, Sister Lai, who lives in Beiyuan Community, Sanbao, Hangzhou, disappeared in the middle of the night. Her family members searched for 100,000 people. The public security organs discovered that her husband Xu Guoli was suspected of committing a major crime. According to the announcement of the opening of the Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court, Xu Guoli’s suspected intentional homicide case will be held at 9 o’clock on May 14.
Previously reported:
In the early morning of July 5, 2020, the criminal suspect Xu Guoli killed his wife while he was asleep due to family conflicts. After being divided and discarded, part of his body tissue was flushed into the septic tank through the toilet.
[Hangzhou Wife and Separation Case Residential Housing Prices Are Not Affected, Neighbor Moves Out for Rent]
The “Hangzhou Wife and Separation Case” will open in court on the 14th. Weekly Jun will visit the community where the case occurred. There are still seals on the door of Ms. Lai, the victim, and a mirror and other evil-shielding objects are hung on the door of the neighbor next door. According to the residents of the community, neighbors rented out their houses after the incident. “I was afraid when the accident happened. After a long time, everyone is not afraid.” Regarding the news that the housing price of the community has plummeted to 18,000 yuan, according to the news. It is understood that the housing price of this community has not fallen, and the average price is around 35,000 yuan.

The case has been in court: the defender proposed that the evidence chain for Xu Guoli’s killing of XX was lacking and was not a premeditated crime. Xu Guoli’s subjective viciousness was small, and he requested the court to give him a lighter punishment and apply for a psychiatric appraisal; the prosecutor believed that it should be The evidence presented by the court was sufficient to confirm the charges against Xu Guoli. There was no need for a psychiatric appraisal, and Xu Guoli had committed a premeditated crime. The criminal method was extremely cruel, the social impact was bad, and the crime was extremely serious. The defendant Xu Guoli pleaded guilty and repented in the final statement. Mental illness is also used as an argument. This has really become a universal defense. If there are no accidents, standing upright should be his final outcome. This thing is too bad and the social impact is too great. In fact, the focus now lies on the prosecution’s allegations and the defendant’s defense during the trial. I don’t know what kind of mentality Xu Guoli will face when facing this trial. I don’t know how he elaborated on these facts. I don’t know what his defense lawyer did for him is the convenient defense opinion. Will he appeal if he is sentenced to death? These are unknown. It is estimated that this case will not be heard in public. After all, it involves too many details of the crime, which are not easy to make public.

zhiwo

By zhiwo

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
helpmekim
6 months ago

The trial has ended, the notice of the Intermediate Court has come out, and the sentence will be announced. 1. The three expert appraisers are defense lawyers who applied to testify in court. 2. Both the defense lawyer and the defendant defended the crime, and the defendant had no doubt about the facts charged by the public prosecution agency. 3. Whether it is a premeditated crime is the focus of controversy in the court trial. According to my limited understanding, the Hangzhou Intermediate Court attaches great importance to this case, and believes that with the joint efforts of the prosecution, defense, and trial, this case will eventually give the people a satisfactory answer. Disputes in the current case mainly focus on the facts: 1. Whether the existing evidence is sufficient to prove the death of the victim (there may be an expert expert in court); 2. Whether the existing evidence is sufficient for conviction and whether reasonable doubt is ruled out; if the evidence is sufficient to determine The fact that Xu deliberately killed someone, the issue of sentencing is actually not a difficult point. In addition, the case is open to court.

heloword
6 months ago

To add more details for Zhiyou: The prosecution stated in the indictment that Xu Guoli’s killing methods were extremely cruel and the circumstances were extremely bad, and he suggested that he should be sentenced to death. The prosecutor also pointed out that Xu Guoli had a circumstance of retracting his confession. At about 10:00 on May 14, a reporter from the Beijing News learned from an observer at the court trial that Xu Guoli was wearing a white protective suit in the court and he did not want to recall the details of the crime. “He said that the previous confession already had it.” When mentioning the motive for the murder, Xu Guoli’s mood collapsed for a while. According to Xu Guoli’s confession, the conflicts between him and his wife are mainly about daily life chores, such as house and money, and education for his youngest daughter. On the morning of May 14, the Hangzhou man’s murder and dismemberment case opened in the Second Court of the Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court. The picture shows the entrance of the court. Beijing News reporter Yuan Suwen at the court hearing: Xu Guoli’s application for psychiatry was rejected. Participants at the court hearing said that Xu Guoli’s relationship with his wife was “usually good on the surface, but in the past few years there have been great contradictions. Daily life chores.” Xu Guoli confessed, “I have an assigned house, which needs to be signed by the husband and wife, but my wife is unwilling to sign, but I want to fix the money”, and the property rights of the house and water, electricity, and gas, They all write the name of the wife alone, “therefore, there is a contradiction in my heart, and the grievances are in my heart for a long time.” In addition, the relationship between the two has changed and the education of the youngest daughter. Her daughter’s grades have fallen sharply in recent years, but his wife “has never let me intervene in my daughter’s education issues. I feel very stressed and conflicted because of these things.” Talking about this, Xu Guoli burst into tears and said Said “I love her, but I also hate her, there is no way.” After a long time, the mood calmed down. At the scene of the trial, after the victim was given sleeping pills and asphyxiated by Xu Guoli on the night of the crime, whether he woke up during the process became a focus of the trial. Xu Guoli confessed that his wife woke up once, but did not struggle after waking up, only called his name once. The prosecutor pointed out that only Xu Guoli himself confessed this detail. The prosecution also asked Xu Guoli whether there was a wound on his hand, but he did not directly answer. Regarding the purchase of band-aids after the incident, he said that it was not used for the treatment of his wounds after the incident, but for daily use. Xu Guoli filed a psychiatric appraisal in court, which was rejected by the court. The reason for the rejection was that Xu’s murder process was meticulous, and he lied and disguised himself afterwards, and his family had no history of mental illness. A reporter from the Beijing News learned that it was the judicial bureau appointed legal aid lawyers to defend Xu Guoli, and Xu Guoli’s underage daughter did not appear in court. Previously reported: The youngest daughter was raised by her sister. On the morning of May 14, a reporter from the Beijing News saw the victim Laimuli and his ex-husband’s daughter Yu and her husband. The two were about to drive to the Hangzhou Intermediate Court to participate in the trial. When asked whether Xu Guoli and Laimuli’s daughter Xu Mouyi knew about the opening of the court, Yu Mou’s husband shook his head with a sad expression on his face. After that, he stopped answering any questions. The reporter noticed that the case was accompanied by a civil lawsuit, and the plaintiffs in the civil lawsuit were Xu Mouyi and Yu Mou. Xu Mouyi is 12 years old this year, and Yu is 30 years old this year. When his mother came to Mouli was killed and died, and his father Xu Guoli was taken criminal coercive measures, Xu Mouyi was raised by her aunt at first, and now by Yu and her husband. The wife who was killed by Xu Guoli came to Laimuli, who was 51 years old when she was killed. On July 25, 2020, the Hangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau reported that the case was a premeditated case of intentional homicide. In the early morning of July 5, 2020, the suspect, Xu Guoli, was in Sanbao North, Jianggan District, Hangzhou City in the early morning of July 5, 2020. In Yuan’s house, he killed his wife while he was asleep when he was asleep. The body was divided and discarded. Part of the body tissue was flushed into the septic tank through the toilet. On July 30, 2020, the Hangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau requested approval for the arrest of the suspect Xu Guoli on suspicion of intentional homicide. On August 6 of the same year, the Hangzhou City Procuratorate arrested the suspect Xu Guoli on suspicion of intentional homicide. On January 28, 2021, at the second plenary meeting of the Fifth Session of the Thirteenth People’s Congress of Zhejiang Province, Jia Yu, the chief prosecutor of the Zhejiang Provincial People’s Procuratorate, mentioned in the work report that after the murder of his wife in Hangzhou, the Hangzhou Municipal People’s Procuratorate Intervened in advance. On January 5 this year, the case was transferred to the Hangzhou City Procuratorate for review and prosecution. A lawyer who had accepted the appointment of Xu Guoli’s family and was later relieved of the entrustment told the Beijing News reporter that the reason he wanted to defend Xu Guoli was because “this kind of public-focused cases require lawyers to intervene before they can reach the defense. It is a kind of balance to avoid unjust cases and achieve the effect of a fair trial.” The lawyer believes that Xu Guoli’s cruel modus operandi has caused a sensational social effect and is likely to be sentenced to death. Source: Beijing News

helpyme
6 months ago

This is one of the most creepy cases I have ever seen, because it was only heard before. This is the first time I doubted it from an interview. I thought it was very strange, and finally confirmed it in the news. What did Xu Guoli do? Killed her wife’s body and insulted his wife’s IQ and personality. The corpse was chopped up and thrown into a septic tank. The corpse was corrupted due to the high temperature of 40 degrees and dung maggots. The police drained 38 cars of dung. Find clues and evidence, what kind of hatred? The villain has seen and heard of the creepy technique, but I have never heard of someone so cruel this time. Even in such a hot summer, I can still feel a bit of chill. Many people don’t understand the nature of this case and what it means. Some people asked Xu Guoli to kill his wife in many ways. How could he go to the river and climb the mountain? In this way, his wife’s death could easily be classified as an accidental death, because it was pushed down. It’s extremely difficult to distinguish from falling in a place where there is no monitoring. Isn’t it much simpler to report to the crime with crying and say that your wife fell to death? Why do we have to choose the most dangerous one, the most dangerous one? Actually, I still have to report the crime, not to avoid the reporter’s interview, so I want the world to know that her wife is gone. Why? Why is he so courageous? Why did Xu Guoli accept the reporter’s interview, and it was very high-profile at the beginning. It’s important to know that accepting an interview is more likely to cause enthusiasm. Small loopholes may also be questioned in full view. He is a normal-minded person who is anxious and refuses to be interviewed. For a while, he couldn’t immediately understand the logic of this matter, why he acted so high-key after killing someone, and didn’t deal with it calmly and low-key. Because what Xu Guoli needs is not officially recognized that his wife died accidentally, but officially recognized as missing forever. If his wife is found dead, it would be detrimental to him even if he can escape the crime, because the wife’s pre-marital property will be inherited by her and her ex-husband’s biological daughter for a large part, so the property he can control is much less, and one person is If he is found to be missing, there will be no inheritance, and he can always “keep” the property of his missing wife. Before Xu Guoli’s death, all the properties were in fact under Xu Guoli’s control. Therefore, Xu Guoli needs a disappearance of her wife’s body. As for the application for declaration of death, it not only takes four years, but also requires the interested person to apply. The application is not necessarily confirmed. Once confirmed, the property has basically been transferred. So, under such a calm thinking, the creeps happened. So if the death penalty is not possible, what is the use of the death penalty?

sina156
6 months ago

On May 14, the much-watched “Hangzhou Wife Killing Case” opened in Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court. According to the Zhejiang Court website, the suspect Xu Guoli was prosecuted for intentional homicide. The case was accompanied by a civil lawsuit, and the plaintiffs were Xu and Yu. China News Weekly learned at the trial that Ms. Lai and her ex-husband’s eldest daughter participated in the trial as plaintiffs. Some citizens were also onlookers at the gate of the court, hoping to participate in the trial. However, they were unable to enter the court hearing because they did not register in advance. On July 5, 2020, the disappearance of Hangzhou Lai caused concern. 19 days later, the police issued a report stating that Ms. Lai had been killed and her husband Xu Guoli was suspected of committing a major crime. According to the police report, Xu Guoli was dissatisfied with Ms. Lai due to conflicts in family life. In the early morning of July 5, she was killed at home while Ms. Lai was asleep, and the bodies were divided and abandoned. Nearly a year after the incident, China News Weekly visited the area where the incident occurred again, and the residents’ life has returned to calm. Outside the door of the house where Ms. Lai and Xu Guoli used to live together, the seal has been broken and dust has fallen, and the neighbors next door are still living normally here. Lawyer outside the case: Xu Guoli is likely to be sentenced to death. In the early morning of July 5, 2020, 53-year-old Ms. Lai went missing from her home in Beiyuan District, Sanbao, Hangzhou. After the family called the police, her husband Xu Guoli offered a reward of 100,000 yuan for clues. It is understood that Ms. Lai used to be a cleaner at an accounting firm in Hangzhou, and Xu Guoli was a driver of a company. The two belonged to a remarried family and both had children with their original spouse, and their youngest daughter was more than ten years old. A few days after Ms. Lai “disappeared”, on July 22, the police collected 38 vehicles of filth from the septic tank and extracted and detected suspected human tissue. After DNA comparison, the body tissue of Ms. Lai was identified. The police judged that Xu Guoli might have been killed, and Xu Guoli was suspected of a major crime. The victim put a seal on the door of Ms. Lai’s house. On July 25, 2020, the Hangzhou police informed the public that this was a premeditated case of intentional homicide. According to the victim’s husband Xu Guoli’s preliminary account, he was dissatisfied with Ms. Lai due to family conflicts. In the early morning of July 5, she was killed at home while Ms. Lai was asleep, and the body was divided and abandoned. On July 30, the Hangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau requested approval for the arrest of the suspect Xu Guoli on suspicion of intentional homicide. On the basis of early intervention in accordance with the law, the Hangzhou People’s Procuratorate found that the criminal suspect Xu Guoli’s criminal methods were cruel and bad in nature, and he was suspected of intentional homicide. On August 6, the same year, he made a decision to approve his arrest. On January 28 this year, Jia Yu, the chief prosecutor of the Zhejiang Provincial People’s Procuratorate, stated that the Hangzhou Municipal People’s Procuratorate intervened in advance in accordance with the law after the Hangzhou Wife Murder case occurred. On January 5, the case was transferred to the Hangzhou Municipal Procuratorate for review and prosecution. At the entrance of the Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court, a middle-aged man who claimed to be Ms. Lai’s uncle far told China News Weekly that after the incident, the son of Xu Guoli and his ex-wife wanted to inherit Xu Guoli’s property, and Xu Guoli’s younger brothers and his family were also willing to raise his children. Daughter, “They said they are willing to raise them, and they promised to raise them well, but we are definitely not willing.” According to Fan Chen, a lawyer at Beijing Jingshi Law Firm, Xu Guoli is likely to be sentenced to death based on the current case. The husband and wife were originally the people who trusted each other the most. Ms. Xu Guoli would kill in the future, and the method was cruel, which would cause serious harm to the society. In addition, he reported to the false police after committing the crime, which increased the difficulty for the police to solve the case, and there was no sign of repentance. This may be regarded as ” Sentencing is one of the plots. The septic tank in the community where the incident occurred was changed to a parking space, and floor monitoring was installed nearly a year after the “Hangzhou Wife Killing Case” occurred. On May 13, China News Weekly visited the scene of the Sanbao Beiyuan case again. Due to the long lapse of time, the four seals at the door of Ms. Lai’s house have been broken and dusted, and there is still a gas security check notice on the door. Among the three neighbors on the same floor, some have moved away, and some are living normally here, with mirrors and wormwood on their doors. To this day, the residents of Sanbao Beiyuan Community have rarely mentioned this matter. The location of the septic tank has been changed to a parking space, and monitoring has been installed on each unit floor. “It’s been so long and I’m not so scared anymore,” a resident of Building 4 told China News Weekly. An old man in Building 5 of Sanbao Beiyuan said that the community is a relocation house. After it was completed in 2010, many owners got multiple houses. After the incident, some people rented out the houses here, but they did not move a lot. Go situation. However, the housing price of the community did not fall sharply because of this case. “Before the incident (the average price) was probably close to 35,000, and it is still very expensive now. At least it may cost 28,000 to 30,000.” The Hangzhou Wife Murder Case occurred. Many intermediaries near the community said that the relocation housing community has not yet applied for a real estate certificate and cannot be bought or sold at the moment. Therefore, there is no rise or fall. However, there are indeed many tenants in the community. Because the community is close to the school and the Qianjiang New Town business district, some people move out and some people rent it out. The housing is relatively tight. “88 square meters of 4700, not much can be rented, most of them are rented out. What happened last year (It has no effect on rent prices)”. But some people are afraid of this. According to media reports, a man rented a room in the community through an intermediary. He only found out that the “Hangzhou Wife Murder Case” was found directly below the house he rented three days later. Subsequently, the man moved out immediately, and was only willing to pay the rent for 3 days, demanding the refund of the remaining rent and intermediary fees. For this reason, discussions have also been triggered online. An old man in the community recalled to China News Weekly that when she learned that the disappearance had been turned into a wife and corpse case, she immediately panicked and did not even dare to go downstairs. During the chat, she pointed to the location of the septic tank and said that after the incident, some residents had laid flowers to pay tribute to the scene. During the Ching Ming Festival this year, some people burned incense and paper downstairs, guessing that they might be relatives of Lai. After learning that the case was in court on May 14, the old man said that he would watch TV to follow the outcome of the trial.

yahoo898
6 months ago

This is a criminal case that has received great attention from the society and has a huge impact. As an ordinary person, I believe that many people are curious about the suspect’s motives and specific methods of committing the crime. Why did the suspect commit such a cruel and inhumane crime, and how did he destroy his corpse? Before the outcome of the trial comes out, these details have yet to be discovered and paid attention to. In fact, the Hangzhou Intermediate Court was also very cautious in handling this case. From announcing the specific opening time, to making an appointment to participate in the observation, to the number of people allowed to observe, all were cautious. As other known friends said, considering the specific details of the case and the degree of social impact, whether the court will open court hearings may be unknown. Earlier in the morning, I heard from friends around me that there are only 15 seats in the hearing gallery of the Intermediate Court, and an appointment is required (the authenticity is unknown). Going back to the case itself, the suspect Xu’s methods of committing the crime are extremely crazy and cruel. He deliberately murdered family members and dismembered the corpses to conceal the truth, whether it was from the plot of the case or the severity of the social impact, and the suspect’s criminal consequences. Serious, subjectively malignant, personal and socially harmful, individuals tend to convict the suspect of intentional homicide, and the death penalty will be executed immediately. Of course, a lighter punishment may be involved in the process of a specific case, such as the suspect’s plea, confession, compensation and understanding, etc. The final defense of the defender and whether the court accepts it depends on the circumstances of the court trial. “Criminal Law” Article 232 [Intentional Homicide] Intentional homicide shall be sentenced to death, life imprisonment, or fixed-term imprisonment of more than ten years; if the circumstances are minor, the sentence is three to ten years in prison. In order to be able to have a more intuitive judgment on the result of the first instance of this case, I searched the judgment document website with keywords such as “intentional homicide”, “intermediate court”, “division of the body”, “throwing the body”, and “family conflict”. Some cases are for reference. 1. Fu Mingxing, Ji Yanfang and other criminal verdicts of the first instance of intentional homicide: One night in July and August 2015, Fu Mingxing, Ji Yanfang and his second sons Fu Benben and Zhang ** were in their home (Jiangsu Province). Fu Er Wholesale Shopping Center, No. 39 Wufuzhuang Village Street, Yangji Town, Guanyun County), killed the third son Fu Moujia. In order to conceal the facts of the crime, the defendant Fu Mingxing will dismember Fu Moujia’s body. The next day Fu Mingxing, Ji Yanfang, Fu Benben, and Zhang ** buried the dismembered bones in the toilet tunnel outside the southwest gate of the Fuer Wholesale Shopping Center and twisted them. Broken human tissues were discarded in the river section of Dongmenzhaqiao. The defendants Ji Yanfang, Fu Benben, and Zhang ** voluntarily signed a confession and confession, expressing their confession and confession. Results: 1. The defendant Fu Mingxing committed intentional homicide and was sentenced to life imprisonment and deprived of political rights for life. (Pleased guilty and punished) 2, Chen Caiguan, Tang Jianying Intentional Homicide First-instance Criminal Judgment Case: The relationship between the defendant Chen Caiguan and Tang Jianying was at odds. At about 16:00 pm on July 2, 2019, the defendant Chen Caiguan to the defendant Tang Jianying’s temporary residence at the ×× Building ×× Road ×××× Town, Lianjiang County, Fujian Province, found that Tang Jianying’s boyfriend, the victim, Huang Mou 3, was also there. Inside the room. Chen Caiguan was resentful, went downstairs to take a single-edged sharp knife from his electric car, returned to the house and took another kitchen knife, and had a dispute with Huang 3. During the period, Chen Caiguan used a sharp knife and a kitchen knife in both hands to hack and stab Huang’s 3 neck, waist, back, legs and other parts, resulting in his death on the spot. Tang Jianying’s dissuasion was invalid. Later, Chen Caiguan cleaned up the scene and wrapped the body of Huang 3 with the help of Tang Jianying, and used Huang 3’s motorcycle to transport the body to ×× Village ×× Road ××, Lianjiang County, where the body was thrown away. Result: 1. Defendant Chen Caiguan committed the crime of intentional homicide and was sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve and deprived of political rights for life. (Frankly, the attitude of pleading guilty is good) 3. Meng Guangyan’s intentional homicide first-instance criminal verdict: Defendant Meng Guangyan was in the home of 1-4-1202, Tianhe Jiayuan Community, Shilou Town, Fangshan District, Beijing on the evening of April 18, 2019 Meng Guangyan used both hands to choke Xiao 1’s neck due to emotional disputes and fought with his wife Xiao, causing him to die. Later, he used an axe, a kitchen knife, etc. to mutilate Xiao’s body and abandon it. Result: 1. Defendant Meng Guangyan was guilty of intentional homicide and was sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve (the period of reprieve of death penalty shall be calculated from the date of approval by the Beijing Higher People’s Court) and deprived of political rights for life. (Pleased guilty and punished, compensation and understanding) 4. Fang Tuhua’s intentional homicide first-instance criminal verdict: At 9 o’clock on May 23, 2018, the victim Wang 1 came to the 2nd floor of Zeng Lingran’s home in Pingmao Street, Wuyang Town, Zhenyuan County at the request of the defendant Fang Tuhua In the rental house, I discussed divorce with Fang Tuhua. At about 12 o’clock, the two parties had a dispute during the discussion and pushed each other. After Fang Tuhua pushed Wang 1 onto the bed, he picked up the hatchet in the rented house and hit Wang 1 on the head three times. After Fang Tuhua found that Wang 1 was dead, he took off Wang 1’s clothes and used the rented house. Cut off the two thighs of Wang 1 with a kitchen knife and hatchet. Put Wang 1’s upper body and two thighs into two suitcases of different colors in the rental house. Clean the rental house with a mop and a rag. Wang 1’s clothes, bed sheets and other items were put into a woven bag. Results: 1. The defendant Fang Tuhua committed the crime of intentional homicide and was sentenced to life imprisonment and deprived of political rights for life. (Surrender, confess guilty attitude, obtain understanding, etc.)… It can be seen from the above cases that for cases of intentional homicide that are cruel and have a huge impact, if there is no surrender, confession, confession, understanding, etc., the punishment will be lighter and less severe. In most cases, the first-instance verdict resulted in the death penalty. However, because of some statutory mitigating circumstances, the final first-instance judgment is often either executed immediately (the kind of heinous crime, the kind of anger between humans and gods), or with a suspended death sentence, indefinitely (restricted commutation), etc. In addition, according to news reports, the suspect’s request for psychiatry was rejected by the court. The court held that the killing process was meticulous and cover-up of criminal acts, and his family did not have a history of mental illness. From my personal point of view, I personally strongly agree with the immediate execution of the death penalty for some heinous criminals. Let’s talk about the victim of the case. The 12-year-old daughter who suffered the most was the murderer who killed her mother in court, and the murderer was indeed her own father. How to deal with her future life, I will talk about her parents in the future. , How should I feel?

leexin
6 months ago

Death is his destiny, there is no discussion. Two days ago, 1818 Golden Eye reported that the housing price of the surrounding community was 40,000, but the housing price of this community was only 20,000, and it might not be possible to sell it cheaply. The big social news has a great impact, and people living in this community are not feeling well, it’s really miserable. It was also reported that a boy who rented a house happened to be upstairs, and the lady did not know when he rented it. After living for three days, he found out that the downstairs was a murderous house… This unknowing boy was also miserable… It made him live more than a year. Inhumane people harm others even more harm themselves. The little girl is too pitiful. I hope that no one will bother her and grow up happily. Time will pass, the dead will never have a chance to see this beautiful and prosperous world, and the living will only have to wait for the time to be a little longer, and slowly forget it. I really hope that there will be less social news like this. The world is so beautiful and deserves our gentle treatment. We only have such a short life, there is no need to hurt each other. To be a human being, you must have a basic bottom line in order to live to make sense. The case will always come to an end, and a new day will still come. May everything be peaceful and beautiful.

greatword
6 months ago

The skull has not been found so far, and Lai’s bones are incomplete. The family wants to let Lai go into the soil for safety, so they can only find her clothes to be buried. The community involved is a demolition and resettlement community, and it is normal that the house price is lower than that of the nearby commercial housing community. After Ms. Lai’s body was processed, it flowed away through the sewer, and the neighbors downstairs did not know how they were emotional. Xu Guoli’s psychological quality is absolutely excellent. He killed and divided the body in the middle of the night, and handled it cleanly. The next day, he was still not jealous and heartbeat to accept interviews, as was the case with the hero of the novel. Please be careful when getting married, and leave if you don’t love.

loveyou
6 months ago

Please execute the death sentence immediately, thank you. From an emotional point of view, the family’s intimacy should not be an umbrella for criminal behavior. If you look at it from a legal perspective, is there any reason to support death? In that case, intentional homicide caused one person’s death and should be sentenced to more than ten years of imprisonment, life imprisonment, and death. If there is a choice here, then it can be argued from other aspects that the death penalty should be executed immediately. 1. The murderer was premeditated. The crime is not passionate, temporary, or impulsive, but a premeditated and prepared plan to kill, and clean up the crime scene after the crime, openly accepting public security questions, accepting media interviews, A bounty notice was also posted. This series of behaviors shows that his mental quality is tough. From a subjective malignancy point of view, it is significantly higher than that of general intentional homicides. 2. After the incident, the murderer does not have the circumstances and conditions for a lighter or mitigated punishment 1. The murderer’s return to the case stems from the investigation of the case. Even if the summons of Xu by the public security organs can be determined to be surrender, the meaning is different from other cases. Volunteer: When things have developed to this point, no one thinks that Xu can slip away under the nose of the police, right? The only option to surrender is forced by helplessness, which is different from the surrender of a fugitive suspect. The Supreme People’s Court’s death penalty review ruling on the murder of Zhu’s wife in Hongkou, Shanghai 2. So far, no reports have been found that the victim’s family has received compensation or understanding, so there is also no reason for mitigation or lighter punishment. 3. The case caused a bad social impact. Thousands of property owners moved out of the Hangzhou Wife Murdering case. There are only 2 households living in the same building. No one dared to go out at night. Even if there is no report so exaggerated, it can be seen that the case is in the local area. Influence. If someone says that it is because there is a conflict between the husband and wife that one party is so extreme, then I would like to ask how big the contradiction is, and it can only be solved by killing or smashing the corpse. Gao Sir: Regardless of the story behind a criminal, this story can only help us understand his behavior, not understand his crime. May you stay away from emotional garbage people.

strongman
6 months ago

First stroke the case: On July 6, 2020, Xu Guoli and his family went to the Sijiqing Police Station of the Jianggan District Bureau of Hangzhou Public Security Bureau to report the case, claiming that his wife Lai disappeared at home in the early morning of July 5. The case is very serious. Weird, Xu said that he fell asleep with his wife on the night of July 4, and saw his wife in the early morning of the 5th, but his wife disappeared strangely in the early morning of the 5th. Except for a suspender pajamas, all his wife’s belongings were missing. Not lost. The police issued a report on July 23 stating that Ms. Lai had been killed. After a visit and investigation, it was confirmed that Xu had killed Ms. Lai and dismembered her body due to family conflicts. This case has had a huge impact in the local area and even the whole society. Not only is there a high degree of social discussion, but it has also set off a wave of public opinion that “everyone is at risk”, under such remarks as “unmarried, infertile, and safe.” , To cover up people’s distrust of intimacy has become more serious, and such cases must be dealt with seriously. The Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court opened a court session to hear the case, which also reflects the great impact of the case in the local area. In such cases, the first thing the masses want to know is what punishment the murderer will be punished. Is it a fixed-term imprisonment of more than ten years? Indefinite? Reprieve? Or the death penalty? Although a case of intentional homicide, according to the law, may be sentenced to death, life, or imprisonment of more than ten years, if the circumstances are minor, the sentence is three to ten years. However, because Xu was a premeditated murderer of his wife in this case, and then he was divided into parts, and he also intended to call the thief to catch the thief, and to divert the attention of the masses. This obviously does not belong to a minor situation, so no further analysis will be made. Xu had a conflict with his wife due to family trivial matters, and later had the idea of ​​killing his wife, and after the murder of his wife, he divided the body, reported to the police, and fabricated lies in order to divert the attention of the masses. It can be seen that Xu is subjectively malignant and personally dangerous. Ordinary people generally cannot do such horrible things. Based on the analysis of Zhejiang Province’s case law, Xu is more likely to be sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve and less likely to be dead, but this possibility is not ruled out. Attached are several local court judgments on similar cases: 1. Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court (2016) Zhejiang 01 Xingchu No. 130 Criminal Judgment. Defendant Ye Mou, because his wife often opposed her gambling, developed the idea of ​​killing his wife after a quarrel, three times in succession. At three locations, he attempted to kill and threw his body away to find his wife. It is worth mentioning that Ye Mou also claimed that his wife was missing, and he drove his daughter home before throwing the body. The Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court believes that Ye’s murderous methods, serious consequences, and bad social impact should be severely punished, but this case was triggered by a marriage and family conflict, and Ye was able to truthfully confess the facts of the crime during targeted investigations by the public security organs. The family members were able to actively raise funds for compensation, so Ye was sentenced to death, but he was not immediately executed. 2. Suzhou Intermediate People’s Court (2017) Su05 Xingchu No. 43 Criminal Judgment Defendant Liu was addicted to gambling, lost all his savings, and feared that his wife would find out, so he had the idea of ​​killing his wife. After killing his wife, he hid him at home and then robbed him. Kill another victim. Because Liu was addicted to gambling and murdered his wife, the plot was bad and the consequences were serious; he killed his wife to raise money for gambling, and he used murder as a means to enter the house and rob him, causing death. The crime was of a bad nature, the plot and the consequences were serious, and the subjective malignancy was deep. The society is very harmful, but Liu took the initiative to confess the facts of the crime of murdering his wife. He had surrendered and should be given a lighter punishment. Referee of Suzhou Intermediate People’s Court: Liu was guilty of intentional homicide and sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve. Later, the Supreme People’s Court ruled that Liu’s death sentence was suspended for two years. It can be seen that the courts at all levels are quite cautious about whether to impose a death sentence. This case has not been tried by the court. Whether Xu Mou has truthfully confessed, obtained the victim’s family’s understanding, etc., is still unknown. If Xu Mou has a lighter punishment, It is likely to be sentenced to death with a suspended sentence.

stockin
6 months ago

The death penalty is executed immediately, basically there is no suspense. Secondly, I hope to keep him mysterious about the murder method. Once it is made public, more people will learn it, so I don’t agree to a public trial. I also don’t want the media to disclose Xu Guoli’s criminal methods. I hope that the media from all walks of life will maintain their conscience and report as much as possible on his criminal path and mental history, but do not explore his criminal methods!

greatword
6 months ago

What are the consequences? It depends on where the trial is. If the trial is conducted in the Sichuan High Court, the victim’s children will first issue a letter of understanding and forgive them, and then because the defendant did not infringe further after chopping his wife into meat, he took the initiative to stop, which shows that he has expressed remorse and is subjective. Insufficient malice, and then the defendant cleaned up the scene, and the police drained the septic tank to find some meat residue. This shows that the social impact is small. At least the defendant has a good desire to reduce the social impact of the case. In addition, he actively cooperates with reporters in interviews. If you don’t flee or avoid it, it’s a plot to surrender, you count… with a reprieve, it can’t be any more. This has already taken care of the emotions of the law-blind masses in society, and no matter how much, we in Sichuan law scholars will definitely not agree. ! ~

loveyou
6 months ago

I admire Lao Xu. He said that when his wife was missing, she opened her two big eyes and talked nonsense to the police without blushing. He thought that his body was broken to the extent that the police could not find out until the septic tank was drained. Only then did I admit that it was really sinister and vicious. He also used his own efforts to lower the housing prices in the community and drove away all the neighbors. In the future, the demolition office would have to pull the nails and find Lao Xu, but it is a pity that Lao Xu has reached the end of the road. During the trial, I heard that Old Xu promised to pay compensation to his stepdaughter, but he did not agree to pay a point to his biological daughter, and said that it was not the daughter’s intention. There is a problem. According to Xu’s (he is not worthy of a person’s name) corpse fragmentation method, combined with draining the entire septic tank to find the human body tissues, the police did not say how much the corpse was broken, but it is certain. It will take a long time. It must be a whole night. The movement should not be small, and the biological daughter is in the house. The child is only thirteen years old. Did she never go to the bathroom? What would be the situation if I went there? According to common sense, the offender should pay more for his biological daughter. Why does he not pay for it? Xu criminal also put forward psychiatric evaluation, jokes, such meticulous thoughts and vicious methods, can a mouthful of nonsense be mentally ill? He does not apply the death penalty by injection, he should be executed.

strongman
6 months ago

The death penalty may be the best result. Today, I wrote a note saying that Xu’s family hoped not to sentence the death penalty for the youngest daughter, saying that the youngest daughter no longer had a mother. I looked at me with a question mark. What kind of logic is this? Wouldn’t he be able to take care of his little daughter without being sentenced to death? Even if the death penalty is not sentenced to 15 years and 20 years, it will be sentenced. When the time comes, who will come out to support? Is it necessary for the youngest daughter to come to support a father who killed her own mother? After taking a step back and letting him out now, what else can he do? There will be no financial resources at all, and it is impossible for anyone to work for him. What does he take to take care of his little daughter? Take subsistence allowance? Take the taxpayer’s money? The “unfair” treatment of him by society will magnify his character defects infinitely and make him do radical things. Therefore, the death penalty is the best, and the youngest daughter can also be relieved. When she becomes an adult, the society has forgotten it. The best solution is not to affect the children. Die, it’s good for everyone, including myself.

stockin
6 months ago

Detained to death. In fact, the perpetrators in this case are similar in nature to the perpetrators in the Shanghai murder of his wife and hiding the freezer. Calmly unilaterally disgusted with his wife, bored and tried to evade family responsibilities, coveted his wife’s property. The first two points will be resolved by ordinary men through divorce, but beasts among men will be resolved by killing their wives because of the third point. Can it prove that the murderer had premeditated may be the key to sentencing, but it is also quite obvious in this case that impulsive murder can find the right tool on the spot to wring the corpse into foam and flush it into the sewer? You know, an ordinary old man of his age would have to take the boss’s energy even to cut two catties of ribs. If this person cannot stand still, the social impact of this case may be even worse.

15
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x