I want to play script killing with my friends, but both of us are a little bit unaware of strangers. I am very timid and afraid of saying something wrong. Can you tell me what I need to pay attention to?
Come here, just say a few words. Selection: The existence of a novice notebook is meaningful, so it is not easy for a novice to start with a novice notebook. After all, when I first came up, it was overwhelmed, or I was lonely… It caused a bad experience, and also misled others (I decided to write a novice book recommendation list). Principle problem: novices don’t have to hide that they are novices, but novices. The halo should not be reflected in the principle of being late, leaving early, jumping, frantic self-exposure, opening the sky and so on. No one blames you if you can’t get it out; only if you break the rules will make people look down on you; choose the role: 4. Technical level: Because there are too many, I will just say a few, and I will add them later. After you get the book, first read your tasks carefully (don’t be too curious about the places you don’t want to read for the time being), and then get a good understanding of your background story. In this way, when people ask questions, they won’t get messy and suspicious, or they always say that they don’t remember waiting for me to look through it. In fact, everyone shouldn’t like it very much, and the experience will be reduced. If you feel something that might be detrimental to you, try to say as little as possible at the beginning, and you will lose if you say too much. But there are some things that can advance the storyline (especially in the original book) and don’t have to keep trying to the end. Of course, this requires some empirical judgment, and novices can do not be too pressured, just come a few times. In fact, everyone generally has a dark side, and you can say something appropriately. Observe more of the interpersonal relationships around you (I mean the inside, avoid too much off-site, the relationships I’m talking about below are all inside the inside~). If you feel that you have something to do with some of the players present in this book, you can first ask the host if you can talk privately. After all, some of the relationships are confidential, and it’s not good for anyone to talk directly. But as a group game, if you only talk privately, of course it won’t work, so everything is appropriate. If you search for evidence, I think a good book, the most objective things of the hammer should be placed in the clue card, not all in the player’s book (especially in the book of individual players, it is very problematic ), if someone does not look carefully, they will be blinded. The clues should not be too direct, the murderer is also someone, please give a way to survive (good crooked), come back and continue talking about the players! If the role of the book is roughly divided, it is the murderer and the murderer. The murderer, the murderer must want to hide the most unfavorable evidence to him, but in many cases the evidence card is completely public. So if you are a murderer, you must first figure out what others will find you, and then try to make a reasonable story. Put the evidence in and compile and let the evidence corroborate what you said. The timeline is also very important. Many people will look at the timeline when they push aggressively. This cannot be said to be not a solution. Therefore, in order to avoid being stuck by others, it is recommended to listen to the timeline of others first and figure it out before compiling your own. Motivation is the least reliable but most people use it, so hiding the motivation and throwing it away to a third party is also a way to clean up. Those who catch the murderer, a piece of advice, don’t say “I’m really innocent, I’ll read the book for you”, and then start reading, you are not catching the murderer, you are forcing the murderer to kill you all. In addition, you can explain why your suspicion is not established, and you can also hammer other people you think are suspicious. This is fine, but please don’t hammer everyone present and say, I’m just testing your reaction, then This is not a logic game anymore. Are there any tricks to catching the murderer? Certainly, the timeline is the most obscure, the identity is the most mysterious (one of the ways to hide motivation), the evidence card is not clearly explained, and the happy one is the one (there is always another player to accompany the whole process, saying that we both do everything Together, one of them is very problematic) Wait, then I can write another column to write this, so I won’t go into details for now. I will update when I think of it someday, love you~