On June 14, Jiangxi Province announced the release of the investigation and handling of cheating incidents in relevant test centers for the 2021 college promotion examination. On the evening of June 5, Jiangxi Province’s 2021 junior college entrance examination unified examination subjects appeared suspected to be “leaked questions” and Jiangxi Institute of Engineering test sites have answers on the toilet door during the examination. Jiangxi Provincial Party Committee and Provincial Government attached great importance to it and quickly established investigation and disposal work. Group, public security, education, market supervision and management and other departments immediately launched an investigation. After investigation, during the 2021 college entrance examination in Jiangxi Province, there were serious cheating in the examination centers of Nanchang Institute of Technology and Jiangxi Institute of Technology. There are no leaked questions before the exam, and the exam is valid.

Refining several important information points in the bulletin: 10 minutes after the start of the test on the morning of June 5th, Luo, the invigilator at the test center, used his mobile phone to secretly take pictures of the test questions and sent them to Xu, the head of admissions of Runzhilin, and Xu organized 4 people. The part-time staff of the company made the answer and sent it to Luo Mou and Xu Mouhao, the person in charge of Beiwei Company, and Xu Mouhao transferred it to Zhou Moujie, the person in charge of Beiwei Company, who sent it to the “2020 Runzhi Lin Group”, There are 81 candidates in this group who participated in the college entrance examination this year. According to this fact, Luo, Xu, Zhou and others are suspected of organizing exam cheating. The Jiangxi Provincial Education Examination Institute reviewed the video surveillance video of the examination room where the 81 candidates were located, and compared and analyzed the answer papers. No abnormalities in the examination room were found, and no plagiarism of the answers in the pictures of the “leaked questions” posted on the Internet was found. The public security organs have discovered clues that Luo organized 3 other candidates to cheat. On the morning of June 5th, Leung, the staff of Decheng Education Company, instructed Zhang Mousha and Chen (A), the invigilators of the test center, to take pictures of the test questions during the invigilation period and send back the answers to the test questions. After receiving the answer, Liang immediately forwarded it to the admissions teacher, and finally forwarded it to the student Chen (Department Admissions Assistant). Chen transcribed the answer on the door panel of the toilet in the test center. After analyzing the answer papers, it was found that the answers to the test questions of 151 candidates at the test center were consistent with the answers on the door panel. The subject marking experts determined that the answers were the same and dealt with violations. “Measures for the Handling of Violations of National Education Examinations” Article 7 Educational examination institutions and examination staff discover any of the following behaviors during the examination or after the examination, it shall be determined that the relevant examinee has cheated in the examination: (2) Marking papers In the process, it was determined that the answer was the same; 5. Regarding the teacher Xu Mouxin’s claim that he paid a package of 26,000 yuan to pass the college entrance examination, after investigation, the teacher was suspected of fraud. In a case of undergraduate examination, several suspects who organized cheating and fraud on the examination were brought out, which is shocking! Attached is the relevant legal issues concerning the crime of cheating in organizing examinations: q1 What is the crime of organizing cheating in examinations? In 2015, Article 25 of my country’s Criminal Law Amendment (9) added a new article as one of Article 284 of the Criminal Law: Organizing cheating in the national examination prescribed by the law shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention, and A fine or a fine shall be imposed; if the circumstances are serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years, and shall also be fined. Whoever provides cheating equipment or other assistance for others to commit the crimes mentioned in the preceding paragraph shall be punished in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph. Anyone who illegally sells or provides the test questions and answers specified in the first paragraph to others for the purpose of cheating in the exam shall be punished in accordance with the provisions in the first paragraph. Anyone who substitutes for another person or allows another person to take the examination specified in the first paragraph shall be sentenced to criminal detention or control, and a fine or a fine shall be imposed concurrently or solely. The first paragraph stipulates the crime of organizing cheating in examinations, that is, organizing cheating in national examinations stipulated by law. The crime is a behavioral crime, the subject of the crime is a general subject, and the subjective aspect is intentional. Whether the cheating is successful does not affect the conviction of the crime and the determination of its immediate completion. In other words, the intentional organization of cheating in the national examination prescribed by the law constitutes the crime, and shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention, concurrently or solely with a fine; if the circumstances are serious and the result is aggravated offense, the penalty shall be more than three years and seven years. The following fixed-term imprisonment and fines. q2 Is the college entrance examination a national examination required by law? Article 1 of the “Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Criminal Cases such as Organizing Exams and Cheating” stipulates that the following examinations are “national examinations prescribed by law”: (1) General higher education entrance examinations, graduate enrollment National education examinations such as examinations, higher education self-study examinations, adult college admissions examinations; (2) Central and local civil servant recruitment examinations; (3) National unified legal professional qualification examination, national teacher qualification examination, unified national examination for certified public accountants, accounting majors Technical qualification examination, asset appraisal qualification examination, physician qualification examination, licensed pharmacist professional qualification examination, registered architect examination, construction engineer qualification examination and other professional and technical qualification examinations; (4) Others shall be determined by the central or local authorities and the industry in accordance with the law. Organized national examinations. We know that there are two types of college promotion: the first type is general higher education (universal enrollment), and the test subjects are limited to full-time college graduates. The second category is the undergraduate promotion of adult higher education. Among them, the first category belongs to the entrance examination for ordinary colleges and universities, and the second category belongs to the entrance examination for adult colleges and universities, both of which belong to the national examinations stipulated by law. q3 In this case, if the relevant circumstances of cheating in the organized examination are true, does it belong to the “serious circumstances”? First of all, it needs to be clarified that the examination involved in this case is the college entrance examination for ordinary colleges and universities in Jiangxi Province, which belongs to the “regular college enrollment examination.” Article 2 of the “Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Criminal Cases such as Organizing Examination Cheating” stipulates that organizing examination cheating in the general college admissions examinations, postgraduate admissions examinations, and civil servant recruitment examinations; organization Those who cheated more than 30 times are considered “serious circumstances.” Regarding the considerations behind this provision, please refer to the interpretation by Jiang Qibo, Director of the Research Office of the Supreme People’s Court: According to legal provisions and combined with judicial practice, Article 2 of the “Interpretation” sets nine criteria for determining the “serious circumstances” of the crime of cheating in organizing examinations. It is clearly stipulated that it generally involves the following six aspects: One is the type of examination. General college admissions examinations, postgraduate admissions examinations, and civil servant recruitment examinations have a high degree of social attention, great influence and wide coverage. Therefore, the “Interpretation” directly stipulates that the organization of cheating in these three types of examinations is “serious.” The second is behavioral consequences. The “Explanation” clearly stipulates that the test will be postponed, cancelled, or used as alternate test questions as “serious circumstances.” The third is the subject of behavior. Examination staff organized cheating in examinations in violation of their responsibilities, and the subjective malignancy was even greater, so the “Interpretation” stipulated it as “serious circumstances.” The fourth is the geographical scope. Organizing candidates to cheat across provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government is very harmful, so the “Interpretation” stipulates it as “serious circumstances.” The fifth is the quantity standard. The “Explanation” will organize multiple cheating on exams, organize more than 30 people to cheat, and provide more than 50 pieces of cheating equipment as “serious circumstances.” Sixth, illegal income. From the perspective of judicial practice, according to the different examinations involved, the amount of illegal income obtained by organizing examination cheating or providing cheating equipment and other assistance varies greatly. Based on the consideration of severely punishing the crime of cheating in organizing examinations, the “Interpretation” stipulates that the illegal income is more than 300,000 yuan as “serious circumstances.” In other words, if the case is verified, whether it is in terms of the type of examination or the number of organizations, the case is very likely to be “serious.”

zhiwo

By zhiwo

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
helpmekim
7 months ago

I don’t know what to say, money has two tactics, which hurts the character of ancient and modern times. Undergraduates are ignorant, and the university teachers are also ignorant. Why is this extremely bad incident? The first is the large number of people involved, and the second is the bad influence. Multi-person interaction, the off-campus counseling organization re-examines the enrollment teacher and the invigilator, and then transmits the answers to the candidates. Especially the operation of the second toilet door to make the answer, this is the operation of the agent on the cliff. Admissions teachers, sophomores don’t know how much money they have left, so they have pitted themselves. Finally, regarding the situation of the “leakage” picture circulating on the Internet, the picture is from Fuliang Beiwei Culture and Art Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Beiwei Company, Jiangxi Runzhilin Education Consulting Co., Ltd. Jingdezhen partner) responsible person Zhou Moujie Sent to the “2020 Runzhi Forest Group”. Before this year’s college entrance examination, Jiangxi Runzhilin Education Consulting Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Runzhilin Company, which is an education consulting company and has not obtained a school permit), the head of enrollment Xu Mou colluded with Luo Mou, the invigilator of Nanchang Institute of Technology, the test site . On the morning of June 5th, 10 minutes after the exam started, Luo used his mobile phone to secretly photograph the test questions and sent them to Xu. Xu organized 4 part-time staff from the company to complete the answers and sent them to Luo and Xu, the person in charge of Beiwei Company. Hao, Xu Mohao transferred it to Zhou Mojie, who sent it to the “2020 Runzhi Lin Group”. After investigation, there are 81 candidates in this group who participated in this year’s college entrance examination. After investigation by the public security organs, the Jiangxi Provincial Education Examination Institute conducted a replay review of the video surveillance video of the examination room where the 81 candidates were located, and at the same time conducted a comparison and analysis of the answer sheets. No abnormalities in the examination room were found, and no plagiarism was found on the pictures of “leaked questions” posted online. The situation in the answer. In addition, the public security organs have discovered clues that Luo organized three candidates to cheat, and they are under investigation. At present, the public security authorities have detained Nanchang Institute of Technology teachers Luo, Jiang, Yang, Ren Mohua, Liu Modao, the legal representative of Runzhilin Company Cao Molu, the person in charge Xu, and the person in charge of Beiwei Company Xu Hao and Zhou Mojie and other 9 people. Regarding the online report of the answer on the toilet door during the exam at Jiangxi Institute of Engineering, after the examination on the morning of June 5th, after the examination for the college upgrade, Jiangxi Decheng Education Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Decheng Education Co., Ltd., the company for education (Consulting company, did not obtain school permit) staff member Liang instructed Zhang Mousha and Chen (A), invigilators of Jiangxi Institute of Engineering, to take test questions during the proctoring period and send the answers to the questions to Liang. After receiving the answer, Liang immediately forwarded it to the admissions teacher of Jiangxi Institute of Technology Xiong Mouhua, Xiong Mouhua forwarded the answer to the admissions teacher Zhan Moumin, Zhan Moumin forwarded it to the admissions teacher Feng Moubin, and Feng Moubin forwarded it to Jiangxi Engineering College sophomore student Chen (this student works part-time in Decheng Education Company and is Feng Mobin’s admission assistant). Chen Mousheng copied the answer on the door panel of the first squat on the third floor of the toilet in the BC building of Jiangxi Institute of Engineering. The Jiangxi Provincial Education Examination Institute conducted a replay review of the video surveillance video of the Jiangxi Institute of Engineering test site, and found that many candidates entered and exited the exam room during the exam. After analyzing the answer papers, it was found that the answers to the test questions of the 151 candidates at the test center were consistent with the answers on the toilet door panels we currently have. The subject scoring experts determined that the answers were similar and dealt with violations. At present, the public security organs have detained Liang Mou, Zhang Mousha, Chen Mou(A), Xiong Mouhua, and Zhan Moumin. They have been released on bail pending trial. Feng Moubin, Zhao Mouwei, Jin Mousen, Ai Mouhui, Chen Mou (B). Chen has 6 people. Among them, Liang Mou is a staff member of Decheng Education Company, 6 persons are Zhang Mousha, Chen Mou(A), Xiong Mouhua, Zhan Moumin, Feng Moubin, and Zhao Mouwei are faculty members of Jiangxi Institute of Engineering, and the other 4 persons are part-time cooperation. Enrolling students. At present, the case is still under investigation. Regarding the online transmission of a woman who claimed to have passed the college entrance examination by paying a package of 26,000 yuan, it was investigated that the woman was Xu Mouxin, a teacher at Nanchang Institute of Technology. She was suspected of fraud and has been dealt with in another case.

heloword
7 months ago

On the evening of June 5, there were reports on the Internet that there were suspected “leaking questions” in the unified examination subjects of the 2021 college entrance examination in Jiangxi Province, and there were answers on the toilet door during the examination of Jiangxi Institute of Engineering. It was verified that during the 2021 junior college entrance examination in Jiangxi Province, there were serious cheating in the test centers of Nanchang Institute of Technology and Jiangxi Institute of Technology. There are no leaked questions before the exam, and the exam is valid. From the “Bulletin”, look at the situation of the “disclosure” pictures circulating on the Internet. The picture of the leak was sent by Zhou Moujie, the person in charge of Fuliang Beiwei Culture and Art Co., Ltd. to the “2020 Runzhi Forest Group”. Before the college entrance examination this year, Xu, the head of enrollment of Jiangxi Runzhilin Education Consulting Co., Ltd., colluded with Luo, the invigilator of Nanchang Institute of Technology, the test site. This company is an education consulting company and has not obtained a school permit. Looking at it this way, it’s completely the abominable behavior of institutions that have collected money to help cheat. After the exam started on June 5, Luo used his mobile phone to secretly photograph the test questions and sent them to Xu. Xu organized 4 part-time employees of the company to make answers and sent them to Luo and Xu Mohao, the person in charge of Beiwei Company. Xu Mohao then forwarded it to Zhou Mojie, who sent it to the “2020 Runzhi Lin Group”. And this group has 81 candidates who participated in this year’s college entrance examination… After investigation by the public security organs, the Jiangxi Provincial Education Examination Institute conducted a replay review of the video surveillance video of the examination room where the 81 candidates were located, and at the same time, the answer sheet was compared and analyzed. An abnormal situation in the examination room was found, and no plagiarism of the answers in the pictures of the “leaked questions” posted on the Internet was found. In addition, the public security organs have discovered clues that Luo organized three candidates to cheat, and they are under investigation. At present, the public security authorities have detained Nanchang Institute of Technology teachers Luo, Jiang, Yang, Ren Mohua, Liu Modao, the legal representative of Runzhilin Company Cao Molu, the person in charge Xu, and the person in charge of Beiwei Company Xu Hao and Zhou Mojie and other 9 people. As the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate issued the “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Handling of Organized Exam Cheating and Other Criminal Cases”, this is undoubtedly a deterrent to similar opportunists, but there are still people who dare to commit crimes. According to the criminal law, organizing cheating or providing cheating equipment or other assistance for others to commit the crime of organizing cheating in the national examinations stipulated by the law constitutes the crime of organizing cheating in the examination and shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment or criminal detention of not more than three years, in addition or solely to punishment gold. If the circumstances are serious, they shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years, and shall be fined. Cheating on exams must not be tolerated, so as to give other students a reasonable explanation. Finally, there are thorny obstacles on the road in life. Trying to improve yourself is the best solution to overcome obstacles. It is not advisable to take risks.

helpyme
7 months ago

As an examinee of this incident, I said some details that everyone did not know: 1. From the end of the exam, the incident became more and more troublesome. Many people posted Weibo, and finally went on the hot search at night. Then it was gone soon, I knew everything I knew. 2. After the Nanchang Public Security Bureau announced that it would investigate, in the next few days, until the 14th, the day before the results were announced on the 15th, they did not say how it was going. 3. In the past few days, after the college entrance examination, various colleges and universities have begun to advertise recruiting students, including Ruo Zhilin. 4. Those who were caught should be caught, but there are still a lot of things that should be caught, not caught. 5. The college entrance examination is completed in 6.5, and then 6.78 is the college entrance examination, and all the heat is basically the college entrance examination. At that time, many college graduate candidates were desperate and kept posting blogs to maintain their enthusiasm. Even many official blogs’ comments on the college entrance examination were how the Jiangxi college graduate incident was handled. 6. During this period, someone set up multiple groups of joint whistleblowers, posted a lot of evidence, and made a video with ironclad evidence. 7. The co-host said in the group that he was threatened by phone calls, and then these groups disappeared. 8. During this period, but also after the college entrance examination, something went wrong again in Henan Province. 9. The official did not end. The vibrato that I made on June 5th, including the vibrato made by many candidates, was gone. 10. Finally reached the critical point of 6.15. The minimum admission control score for public basic subjects released is 85 points. Previously, various institutions generally predicted that it was 120 points or less, which was quite unexpected. 11. In this incident, many candidates have been constantly reporting, maintaining the popularity, and daring to be real. It is amazing. The final result may not be the most satisfactory, but they compromised and handed in all of us candidates. A passing answer. I think of so much for the time being, and I will add it later.

sina156
7 months ago

I remind everyone that the two schools involved in this incident are all private undergraduate colleges. Many people may not imagine how poor the teachers of private undergraduate colleges are. The teachers of public undergraduate colleges are mostly doctors at younger ages, and masters at older ages. Unless they are very old and graduated very early, some of them have undergraduates, and later all have advanced studies and obtained a master’s degree. In private undergraduate colleges, many “teachers” are students who have graduated from the school and stayed on campus. I know that many private colleges and universities, some of which are very high in the ranking of private education, encourage student leaders to participate in enrollment, and they can stay in school if they do well in enrollment. Most of these undergraduates who stay in school are engaged in student management, but they also have the status of “teacher”. A friend of mine, who graduated with a bachelor’s degree in computer science, worked in a private college for several years and became the deputy dean of a secondary college. The reason is simple. This kind of school is highly mobile. After a few years, everything that should be left is gone. If you can stay, it’s okay to be a leader. Private colleges and universities are the cash machines for private bosses. In terms of school management, the boss has nothing to say, and there is no management standard at all. Teachers have low salaries and high work intensity, which is often blamed. Therefore, private colleges and universities are highly mobile. A private university in Shandong that has been upgraded to a bachelor’s degree recruits counselors all the year round. Because most people work for two or three months, they are on the verge of collapse and leave. Therefore, it is understandable that the “teachers” of private colleges and universities have colluded with lawless elements of off-campus training institutions for their own interests and engaged in such activities. I once said to my consulting classmates that when choosing a career, it is better to enter a private elementary and middle school than to enter a private college. Because some private primary and secondary schools are more standardized in management, and their wages are even higher than those of private universities. Private primary and secondary schools in many places are hard to find, and they have to grab a degree if they want to enter. What about private colleges? Everyone knows that the independent colleges that caused the controversy in the past are better, after all, they still have some genes for public education, not so outrageous. I don’t want to say more about the purely private colleges and universities. With the decrease in the population of the right age, public higher education resources can gradually meet the needs, strengthen the governance of private higher education, and gradually stop private colleges with low school quality from running schools. It should be time. The notice mentioned that the school involved was suspended from holding examination qualifications. Two of the schools involved have been suspended as test sites for next year’s junior college entrance examination. There were also teacher qualification examinations and computer rank examination test centers were also suspended. Among them, Nanchang Institute of Technology has also been suspended next year’s qualifications for undergraduate promotion. It’s really happy.

yahoo898
7 months ago

I suspect that these 151 people are just the tip of the iceberg, but they happened to be caught this time, and there may be a lot of them hidden under the water. One point mentioned in the report: Jiangxi Runzhilin Education Consulting Co., Ltd., which participated in cheating on exams, is an education consulting company that has not obtained a school permit. Failure to obtain a school permit means that you have not obtained the qualification to run a school. Then I went to the official website of Jiangxi Runzhilin to check, there are 9 branch schools and one headquarters. Doesn’t it mean that you have not obtained a school qualification certificate? Why can Jiangxi Runzhilin open so many branch schools grandiosely? Is it because the relevant supervisory authority is not supervising it well, or is it because there are vested interest groups turning a blind eye behind it? This is a malformed product of serious marketization of education. One of the important factors is why the birth population has been declining. The cost of children’s education has risen. Education is a field with a high degree of information asymmetry. Consumers are like lambs on the table. Apart from the reputation of the institution, it is basically difficult to distinguish which is good and which is bad. Since it is necessary to develop a socialist market economy, the strength of the relevant regulatory agencies must be put in place. And you can’t ignore it because it’s a college entrance exam instead of the college entrance examination. I have been squatting on this topic for a long time. I can’t say that there is not much traffic, but it is really not much. It cannot be said that academic qualifications are everything, but at least it is an important opportunity for ordinary children to make a leap and move towards a broader platform. The college entrance examination gives the college students an opportunity to make up for the frustration of the college entrance examination. Take a good look, why can invigilators bring mobile phones, why test students can bring mobile phones into the examination room, and why an educational institution without a school certificate can open so many branch schools.

leexin
7 months ago

I was not surprised to see the Nanchang Institute of Technology in the school involved. In fact, I feel that you deserve to be the Royal Institute of Technology. Nanchang Institute of Technology, you think it’s a good school by its name. It’s actually a private school with high tuition and almost no learning atmosphere. As long as you have money, you shouldn’t be too chic at school. The KTV on the school’s commercial street can be listened to every day. When there are students crying and howling, there is no need to walk in class and sightseeing cars, and there is no need to study at ordinary times. Just sleep, and make up the exam for 30 yuan. There is also a clear exam before graduation. If you have a good relationship with the instructor, you can also arrange to learn. Brother takes the test, but I don’t know if it can be done now. All in all, a school without any learning atmosphere, and a school style that is profit-only, and cheating is a natural fit? To add, I am a 13th junior college with a tuition fee of 10,000 yuan. The school also features a few hundred yuan discount for paying tuition in advance.

greatword
7 months ago

In 2019, there is a private undergraduate school, the province accepts 1,200 junior college students, this school accepts 800 students, and other schools accept up to 40 students per class 1-2. All tuition classes know that this school has 80,000 packages. One in the same dormitory paid 80,000 yuan. Specifically, I first gave papers and answers, and then took the exam at the same time. I couldn’t hand in 80,000 yuan. I studied in the cram school for 3 months and applied for the exam for my private college. For one subject, the school refused to help apply for undergraduate colleges and called the Education Bureau many times. The results were based on the school’s wishes. I didn’t understand why my school just didn’t want you to have a better life, even if it didn’t give me a chance to apply. More than 20 students from the same school were in the same situation, and none of them could register. On the day of the 6.5 test, I experienced the greatest trough and despair in my life. My stubbornness did not make me kneel in front of the group of people and cry. I wandered in the reservoir alone for a long time, thinking of myself. The poor family, and two younger brothers, finally lived for 2 years. I thought I had forgotten it. Knowing the news I read today, I was full of emotions. I hope the storm will be more severe. I also sincerely hope that there will be no more private schools for school education. , I also advise all college entrance examination students after 2021 not to go to private schools.

loveyou
7 months ago

I want to give a thumbs up to the Jiangxi Provincial Education Examination Institute, and at the same time pat the Henan Provincial Education Examination Institute to copy homework :p After investigation, there are 81 candidates in this group who participated in this year’s college entrance examination. After investigation by the public security organs, the Jiangxi Provincial Education Examination Institute conducted a replay review of the video surveillance video of the examination room where the 81 candidates were located, and at the same time conducted a comparison and analysis of the answer sheets. No abnormalities in the examination room were found, and no plagiarism was found on the pictures of “leaked questions” posted online. The situation in the answer. In addition, the public security organs have discovered clues that Luo organized three candidates to cheat, and they are under investigation. Chen Mousheng copied the answer on the door panel of the first squat on the third floor of the toilet in the BC building of Jiangxi Institute of Engineering. The Jiangxi Provincial Education Examination Institute conducted a replay review of the video surveillance video of the Jiangxi Institute of Engineering test site, and found that many candidates entered and exited the exam room during the exam. After analyzing the answer papers, it was found that the answers to the test questions of the 151 candidates at the test center were consistent with the answers on the toilet door panels we currently have. The subject scoring experts determined that the answers were similar and dealt with violations. Video surveillance playback + answer sheet comparison analysis can be considered rigorously responsible for the candidates involved. There are so many people operating the undergraduate examination in the dark. The most fundamental reason for the blatant collusion between school personnel and institutions is that society and even the state do not pay attention to undergraduate examinations. Institutions, teachers and examinees have a fluke mentality and touch the red line of the law again and again. What do you think of the Henan Provincial Recruitment Office’s response to the “Suspicious Leakage Questions of Educational Institutions for the College Entrance Examination”: Transfer from a friend’s message (College Entrance Examination): Don’t just transfer to an undergraduate exam, I am a Henan college entrance examination candidate this year. The school likes to take part in the Tianyi joint entrance exam organized by Tianyi. For the whole three years of high school, he took all my college entrance examinations, because it is really influential in Henan. The college entrance exam usually has more than 200,000 people, sometimes even more. The 20-year college entrance examination students did a certain (1 or 2 or 3) model question. Among them, Physics 3-5 was changed to 19 multiple-choice questions. The result was the same for the 20-year comprehensive paper, and the day one before the exam this year The question type of the Chinese joint examination is not much different from this year’s college entrance examination. Reposted from Zhiyou’s message (college upgrade): Last year’s report, management studies last year was even more annoying! In the end it was nothing. /The year before last, I wrote the original question [covering face] and did someone else’s. We always thought it was too strange to take the exam. We only remembered the answer when we went to the examination room. Problems are not terrible, this is a part of the social process that will inevitably go through. But when there is a problem, you must solve the problem, and don’t let the broken things become worse.

strongman
7 months ago

Many people will associate the cheating incidents in Jiangxi with the cheating incidents in other provinces this year, especially Henan, which has leaked questions for two consecutive years in the examinations for upgrading to colleges. But there are big differences between these two things. First of all, the college leveled up in Henan is an institution leaking questions. The power of ZB is operating, and the channel opened directly by money is that the institution buys the invigilator teacher and the invigilator starts to allocate the invigilator examination room in the morning. What does it mean? An internal ghost in the organization raises the information of the invigilator to the institution. This is Huang Shilang’s active sexual intercourse with ZB. The acquisition of ZB can be solved slowly. After organizing the inner ghost, it will be difficult to investigate. After all, who has the best money to earn, I am sure that the student’s money should be drawn to the institution to pay the tuition. Let the students follow the money and get the money after the institution’s money is as good as the number and return the money to the students in 37%

stockin
7 months ago

xs, my former company did this. A small fart company is not only a college upgrade, but also various types of first-build, second-build, and certificates such as Zhuan. Before I went, I thought it was an ordinary educational institution. After I came, I didn’t feel right. Then I ran away. I was afraid that the boss would be caught one day. Hey, I hope to investigate these so-called “educational institutions” strictly. One of my classmates was also deceived by the so-called certificate + package assignment work, but later they called the police and said it was a contract dispute. The local education bureau also shrugged off each other. There is no alternative. I hope that all localities will be able to strictly investigate these self-examinations and social examinations in the future.

11
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x