Tang Jiangpeng, a member of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, said that it is not just about not being divided, but not the only criterion. It is recommended that the college entrance examination adopt a double-examination and double-screening system. The first time is the qualification line and level test, the questions are simpler and do not put too much pressure on the students; the second time you can pass the delineation of the score line, and the students have selective and professional examinations.

Source [Report from the Two Sessions]: Tang Jiangpeng, a member of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, said that it is not only about points, but not the only criteria for points. It is recommended that the college entrance examination adopt a double-examination and double-screening system. The first time is the qualification line and the level line test. The questions are simpler and do not put too much pressure on the students; the second time, the score line can be delineated, and the students have selective and professional examinations. (CCTV reporter Ye Huan Jiang Haoyu) The core meaning of what I want to say may be: one cannot use the same set of standards, one college entrance examination, and one score to determine a person’s future, but a multi-angle and multi-faceted training and investigation. , Give everyone a suitable way of education and training and a suitable life development path, carry out quality education instead of exam-oriented education, so that there are no classes, and teach students in accordance with their aptitude. This starting point and idea are indeed very good, ideal education is indeed the case, but the actual conditions do not allow it, and it should not be too idealistic. There is still a large number of unbalanced social development in our country. Teachers and students in many county high schools do not have so many sources of information at all. For example, the current 3+X course selection, mathematics, Chinese, English plus three optional subjects, which three subjects choose is a problem, because it is not known whether the choice of which will affect the college application after three years. If elective examinations are implemented, how do students know how to choose? Where there are many sources of information, there is room for arbitrage. Although the current college entrance examination system has various problems, it is undeniable that the current college entrance examination system has great significance: the core of the current college entrance examination system is a selection system, a relatively fair social competition mechanism, and then a kind of education. mechanism. No matter how the college entrance examination is changed, there are several cores that cannot be changed: the college entrance examination is the regulating machine of this society, a selection system, a relatively fair social competition mechanism, and the college entrance examination must be for students from poor backgrounds and ordinary families. An ascending channel left, an opportunity to change destiny, the college entrance examination must be used to select talents, select those who are smart, diligent, self-disciplined and plastic talents. Therefore, the college entrance examination must be the fairest and fairest opportunity to compete, regardless of the student’s background, they must be assessed by the same set of standards. The college entrance examination and the postgraduate examination are the few remaining relatively fair competition opportunities in this society. As the underachievers, they have the most opportunity to change their lives and improve their lives. Going to school, taking the college entrance examination to get into a good university, and taking the postgraduate exam to get a good university are still the easiest, most effective, and most feasible way to change the destiny of yourself and your family.


By zhiwo

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
7 months ago

This proposal is of practical significance. The traditional college entrance examination admission system is adapted to the needs of the previous historical period-compared to cultivating outstanding professionals, at that time more emphasis was placed on low-cost batch training and screening of qualified labor. However, the times have changed, and the supply of ordinary labor has exceeded demand, and everyone is suffering from increasingly serious involution. On the contrary, the lack of high-end talents has not formed a talent training mechanism with significant competitiveness in the local area, which severely hinders the further development of society. Therefore, I think it is appropriate to reform the system in a direction that is more suitable for discovery and cultivating better professionals. At the same time, it allows most people to lay down their burdens and do not have to pay too much youth and youth for things they will never use. Energy is also a matter of immense merit.

7 months ago

It’s really hard for him. There are already batches of people who don’t need to engage in dual-track systems. If it is really to select qualified talents for the university, it is reasonable to use the qualification line. It is because of the limited educational resources that the best admission is made. A simple example is that the university requires a level of 10 and can only recruit 100 people. The so-called qualification line is to ask questions at the level of 10. But now there are 1,000 people taking the exam, and most of them have reached the level 10 standard. Then add the so-called score line to select the best admission and raise the difficulty of the question to level 20. The existing college entrance examination is basically a combination of the two, with basic scores and batches, and this problem is solved through priority admission. Nowadays, universities are deteriorating, and the potential for high-quality jobs is generally concentrated in the double-class. The so-called dual-track system is nothing more than taking off the pants and putting it on. Since you want to take the college entrance examination, you are going to double first class. Who cares about it? This trick is really just a placebo, and it also takes up test resources.

7 months ago

It’s not feasible. The essence is to solve the problem of a lifelong test. Looking at the situation of Zhejiang’s new college entrance examination, the three subjects of Zhejiang Foreign Language and the optional test can be tested twice, and the highest subject is included in the total score. Some candidates even take the test. For full marks, you must also take the second test. The purpose is to consolidate your score rankings and squeeze out potential competitors. After all, the college entrance examination is a selective test. For each additional score, you can get thousands of rankings in the total score. Whether you can enter a double first-class university, the two exams make the candidates and teachers physically and mentally exhausted. After many mock exam opportunities, it is rare to perform abnormally. After the two exams, the possibility of probing questions and leaking questions is greatly increased. You can check it out. Whether this has happened in Zhejiang and Shanghai in recent years in foreign languages ​​and selected examination subjects, this involves fairness in examinations, which must be based on the most important basic point of fairness. This must not be shaken. Therefore, two or more examinations for the college entrance examination must not be implemented.

7 months ago

In fact, there is no need to split the exam into two. Under the existing college entrance examination, the distinction between the exams should be increased, and then different majors can be weighted to calculate the score. Or learn from the old Jiangsu college entrance examination for liberal arts and Chinese with 40 points, science and mathematics with 40 points, different directions are distinguished, of course, do not learn other double A+s. If we do separate screening independent of the college entrance examination, do different schools require different examination papers in order to match the level of students? Isn’t it the end of abandoning the college entrance examination to conduct a comprehensive “comprehensive evaluation”? Japan says that I am familiar with it. Each university has its own examination syllabus and review materials.

7 months ago

Three questions 1. The first qualification level test is simple and without pressure, will it lead to a decline in competitiveness, and how to distinguish the level of students from students. What is the fundamental difference between it and the exam? 2 Students have chosen to focus on study exams. As a result, the number of difficult science subjects such as physical chemistry will be too small. Taking Zhejiang as an example, the proportion of students choosing physics has dropped significantly after taking physics as an exam subject for college entrance examination, so Zhejiang adopts According to the “Opinions”, the system will establish a protection mechanism for selected subjects in the future, of which 65,000 are guaranteed for selected subjects in physics. That is to say, once the number of scores for a certain examination of physics subjects is less than the guaranteed number, the guarantee mechanism is activated, with 65,000 as the base number, and scores are assigned according to the prescribed proportion from high to low. For example, if 65,000 candidates choose physics, the top 1% of the test scores on the paper will receive a score of 100, that is, 650 candidates will have a full score; if only 50,000 candidates choose physics, according to the new method, still There are 650 candidates with full marks. Isn’t it interesting? In order for students to have the right to choose, a selective examination system was adopted. As a result, no one chose physics. In order to solve this situation, we had to choose a guarantee mechanism to guarantee the number of physical candidates. Physics students want to add more points instead of liking physics. Put the cart before the horse. 3 Let us take the United States as an example. Unlike the college entrance examination, the US adopts an application system for university entrance, and there is no uniform standard for evaluation. Does this provide a good soil for students to develop and diversify in an all-round way? The genius of the partial branch has a bright future? But the reality is counterproductive. Such an educational method that seems to be conducive to the development of a variety of talents has led to the lack of absolute comparison standards such as scores. University admissions have become more manipulable. High-end universities are more susceptible to the so-called High art is more inclined. For example, those who like drums and guitars can’t play pianos. Why? The poor can’t learn piano. Although there are many problems with scores as the sole criterion, at least at the current stage, it is the fairest comparison criterion, because children from ordinary families do not have so many opportunities to specialize in one subject and develop elegant interests. Only a poor study can have a chance. Break through the class.

7 months ago

Agree with the idea. The first test is to eliminate the test, and those who fail are not allowed to take the college entrance examination. This range can be set wider. Such as politics, language, history, geography, English, computer, sports… etc. Students who do not have basic common sense or basic health will be eliminated. The second time was the selection exam. For example, the mathematics department can only take maths. Compared with the current exams, students with full scores in mathematics, and students who pass other grades will definitely not be admitted to the top 10 mathematics departments. This kind of unfairness will not appear in the future. The existing college entrance examinations are too unfriendly to students in partial subjects, and most of the workers in the future need partial subjects. I feel that many single-subject princes in our country have been delayed by the existing college entrance examination. What kind of talents are most suitable for the needs of social development? There is a saying that is called broad foundation and deep professionalism. You have to know a lot about common sense, and you can’t have obvious shortcomings. The professional direction should be deep, and the more refined the food, the better. The existing college entrance examination is obviously not like this.

7 months ago

It is not recommended to change the status of college entrance examination admission. In fact, no matter how the college entrance examination is changed, it is impossible to select the most capable talents. The college entrance examination is just a fair arena and an indicator of talent selection. Neither the college entrance examination score nor the university school is the only criterion for talent selection, and no enterprise or institution will judge talents based on scores. As an academic arena, the school should not be changed, nor can it be changed. On the contrary, we should improve the talent selection model of enterprises or units. All academic qualifications must start from the grassroots level and be promoted based on business capabilities.

7 months ago

We must be cautious about the reform of the college entrance examination, after all, this is a major event that affects the whole body. Nowadays, every time I hear that the college entrance examination is a bit turbulent, many candidates and teachers and parents are very nervous. The reform of the college entrance examination will continue to expand the scope of its impact. Not only high schools need to adjust the teaching plan arrangements, but also the corresponding elementary and junior high schools, educational tuition institutions, and university admissions will change. The entire education process must respond to it, but the impact will vary. . It will even gradually affect the social recruitment of employers. The impact is far-reaching and cannot be careless. It has been more than 40 years since my country’s college entrance examination was restored, and many adjustments and reforms have been experienced during this period. Incorporating foreign languages ​​into the college entrance examination has allowed countless students to understand and master foreign languages. Today’s internationalization in China is inseparable; independent enrollment, diversified selection methods; unified college entrance examinations, provincial propositions, and try to avoid differences in regional education resources. The impact has ensured the fairness of the competition for the college entrance examination; the expansion of the college entrance examination has allowed more students to receive university education… During the reform process, it has also gone through a fork in the road, and has been constantly improving and exploring. Formed the current college entrance examination system. We dare not say that the current college entrance examination system must be the best, but at least it is reasonable and feasible under the current social background. Sometimes, the idea is good, but when it is really implemented, it is too late to discover the problem. For example, in 1994, in order to reduce the burden on students, the general college entrance examination system was reformed, and the 3+2 examination system was introduced. The results of it? It is conceivable that the students lack knowledge of geography and biology. Later in 1999, the two subjects of biology and geography became examination subjects again. It is not that the college entrance examination system cannot be changed, but it must be thoroughly studied and carefully considered, and it will be done slowly. A proposal by the NPC deputies has already caused everyone to talk about it. If reforms come, I am afraid that the road will not be easy. To sum up, whether the reform is in line with the needs of social development, we must fully realize the far-reaching impact it will bring and explore carefully.

7 months ago

It is recommended to dilute the test-oriented education and score education system from the elementary and middle schools. Carry out educational guidance according to students’ interests and specialties, increase interest classes in primary and secondary schools, and provide targeted school training for students with specialties, so as to develop and cultivate their potential in one aspect from an early age. This is the cultivation of interest outside the curriculum, as well as the cultivation of a certain subject in the curriculum. If a student is good at math or Chinese, we should take care of other weak subjects. All in all, the state should weaken the one-vote system for primary and secondary school entrance examinations and school selection. For students who have outstanding interests and specialties and are super strong in a certain subject, they also have the opportunity to enter a school with better educational resources to obtain a better education, instead of losing the total score to a good school or being eliminated by the school education . Similarly, university admissions should not be limited to the ranking of total scores. It should be from the perspective of talent training, selecting and discovering talents from students who are suitable for professional training and outstanding in certain subjects. Our current education system has cultivated a large number of top scholars who are very good at doing questions. As a result, they have entered key colleges and universities with abundant educational resources, occupying a lot of college education resources; but those students who have super natural instincts Because of the low total score, the country has lost the good educational resources set by the country, and some gifted students also died under the current education system. The country is actually aware of this problem and is actively planning the reform of the education system. Education is a century of education, and an education system is formed after several generations of practice. To reform it, it will be a huge project. It is impossible to change from A to B at once, and completely negate the previous system; the previous education system still has many merits, and we can use national policies as leverage. , Slowly tilt towards some aspects that are conducive to personnel training and national construction, so that test-oriented education will be transformed step by step and orderly to national talent education and quality education. The state should require universities to set up some professional settings for the interests and specialties of primary and middle school students, so that these children can become experts in a certain aspect of national construction. Education is the foundation of rejuvenating a country! How to educate is an immediate issue worthy of consideration by Chinese people. I hope that the two sessions can really solve some educational problems that benefit the people and the country! Put it into practice, instead of just mentioning some marginal problems, treating the symptoms rather than the root cause.

7 months ago

Ok? Isn’t Zhejiang already doing this? Did I understand it wrong or he was too slow to respond? Double examination and double screening are not Zhejiang’s academic and selective examinations. I think this arrangement is already very friendly to people in partial subjects. Wow, how can I change it? For most college entrance examination subjects, I personally learn it well, except for the partial subjects that I didn’t get into history, and I used to score more than 30 points each time. In the 9A1B exam, this B also deducted 0.1 points at most when I calculated the overall score of the Trinity, not to mention that it was not counted in the total score of the college entrance examination. So how much impact does such a serious shortcoming have in the end? Some people may refute me. History is an optional subject. If it is a compulsory subject, Mathematics, Mathematics and English will have a greater impact. Then I will say, why is the test required for language, mathematics, and English? This question is the core question of education, in other words, what is the basic scientific literacy of citizens? What kind of discipline and what kind of investigation method can test this kind of literacy? As a college student who has just withdrawn from the torrent of college entrance examinations, I am not able to answer this question. But I think that all education reforms must answer these two questions positively, otherwise they will always be in place. In addition, the double examination and double screening have affected the development of versatile talents. I have always felt that people who can do well in different disciplines and fields must have a quality of integrating everything and everything. They are often more confident and willing to try. New things. This difference with professionals should also be reflected in the talent evaluation system. To give a relatively simple and rude example, suppose that the subject evaluation scores of two people are 97.97.97 and 100.60.60 respectively. I don’t care how you choose. I just think this difference should be reflected and paid attention to. I once had a rather heretical idea. The college entrance examination should not limit the number of subjects to be tested. I love to learn a few subjects, so that all-rounders can have all-rounder racetracks, and experts have expert racetracks (of course, the difficulty adjustment It’s required). Don’t get excited, everyone, I just think about it. I don’t have the ability and willingness to put it into practice. Even if I have the willingness and ability, I don’t have the social conditions.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x