Recently, a woman in Anyang, Henan, holding a horn sitting on the roof of a Tesla Model 3 to defend her rights, wrote in white and black, “Tesla brake failed”, while the big speaker played “Tesla Model 3 brake failed during the Spring Festival. It caused a traffic accident, and a family of four nearly died.” The person involved, Ms. Zhang, introduced that when she was driving Model 3 with her family to go out for fun, her father naturally lifted his foot from the switch when he saw a traffic light in the distance while driving, but the car did not slow down, but rather quickly. The speed of the car rear-ended many cars in front, and finally stopped after hitting the concrete barrier on the side of the road. The accident caused Ms. Zhang and her parents to be injured and hospitalized. (As for stepping on or not stepping on the brakes, it is not mentioned in the video)

Do you know how many yards this product is opened on the national highway? Background data: Not to mention speeding at 118.5km/h. It has been settled before, and it is coming again. It will be 3.15 soon. I don’t need to say what the ingredients are. Below are the details of the news, don’t be fooled by the headline party. On March 9, under the coordination of the local market supervision department, the complained Tesla Automobile Sales Service (Zhengzhou) Co., Ltd. and the owner of the car mediation. A “Complaint Mediation Form” provided by Liu Huan showed that the owner’s complaint request was “brake failure, request to return the car.” The two parties voluntarily reached the following agreement: “After selecting the technical institution, we will negotiate the authentication matters.” The representatives of both parties and the mediator signed the signature, and the time of signing was March 9. “The owner of the car signed a mediation agreement, and the company is also willing to advance the appraisal fee. Later, she may have her own ideas, but she regrets it and continues to defend her rights at the door of the store.” Liu Huan said, “The company communicates with the attitude of solving the problem, but the owner does not Too willing to cooperate.” After the incident, Tesla provided Ms. Zhang with the background data of the vehicle. She recorded it and sent it to reporters. The “Tesla background data” provided by her shows that at 6:14:22:36 on February 21, the vehicle was traveling at a speed of 118.5 km/h, and the brake pedal was stepped on in 23 seconds, 17 minutes and 23 seconds. The speed dropped to 116 km/h in 38 minutes, and the ABS (brake system) of the vehicle was activated in 25 seconds and 87 minutes, until after 27 seconds and 45 minutes, the speed dropped to 48.5 km/h. “According to the data provided, the speed at the time of the incident was 48.5 km/h.” Ms. Zhang responded to Tesla’s allegations of speeding. “They do not recognize the data provided by Tesla. They have the ability to change unfavorable conditions through the background. Data.” Regarding the aforementioned “mediation statement”, Ms. Zhang said, “If it is not stamped, it is invalid.”

zhiwo

By zhiwo

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
helpmekim
8 months ago

Do you know how many yards this product is opened on the national highway? Background data: Not to mention speeding at 118.5km/h. It has been settled before, and it is coming again. It will be 3.15 soon. I don’t need to say what the ingredients are. Below are the details of the news, don’t be fooled by the headline party. On March 9, under the coordination of the local market supervision department, the complained Tesla Automobile Sales Service (Zhengzhou) Co., Ltd. and the owner of the car mediation. A “Complaint Mediation Form” provided by Liu Huan showed that the owner’s complaint request was “brake failure, request to return the car.” The two parties voluntarily reached the following agreement: “After selecting the technical institution, we will negotiate the authentication matters.” The representatives of both parties and the mediator signed the signature, and the time of signing was March 9. “The owner of the car signed a mediation agreement, and the company is also willing to advance the appraisal fee. Later, she may have her own ideas, but she regrets it and continues to defend her rights at the door of the store.” Liu Huan said, “The company communicates with the attitude of solving the problem, but the owner does not Too willing to cooperate.” After the incident, Tesla provided Ms. Zhang with the background data of the vehicle. She recorded it and sent it to reporters. The “Tesla background data” provided by her shows that at 6:14:22:36 on February 21, the vehicle was traveling at a speed of 118.5 km/h, and the brake pedal was stepped on in 23 seconds, 17 minutes and 23 seconds. The speed dropped to 116 km/h in 38 minutes, and the ABS (brake system) of the vehicle was activated in 25 seconds and 87 minutes, until after 27 seconds and 45 minutes, the speed dropped to 48.5 km/h. “According to the data provided, the speed at the time of the incident was 48.5 km/h.” Ms. Zhang responded to Tesla’s allegations of speeding. “They do not recognize the data provided by Tesla. They have the ability to change unfavorable conditions through the background. Data.” Regarding the aforementioned “mediation statement”, Ms. Zhang said, “If it is not stamped, it is invalid.”

heloword
8 months ago

This reminds me of the first company where I was employed. Every time there was a fatal accident in the company, family members would come to the company to make trouble, pull banners at the gate, and a family would make trouble at the gate of the company, and then the company leaders would negotiate these things. Almost every time this kind of thing is dealt with, the result is the same: the company provides a humanitarian subsidy of 700,000 yuan, regardless of whether the cause of death is personal, machinery or equipment, or physical condition, the result is 700,000 compensation. Even when I left the company, an employee died of cancer. Many colleagues also donated money when he saw a doctor. In the end, his family members still came to the company to make trouble. So this is the status quo. When it comes to this kind of thing, it is really difficult for big companies to deal with. Many big companies would rather pay the money to deal with the so-called “negative” that has nothing to do with them in private. I hope that one day someone and the company can stand up and speak up for these things! I hope Tesla will not compromise! I also hope that Tesla can respond positively when there is a quality accident in the future!

helpyme
8 months ago

Let me first tell a story about Musk and hackers: In 2015, hacker George Hot issued a statement saying that it took only a month to successfully refit a driverless car in his garage. Lidar, cameras, and computers, network switches, and GPS sensors that can be stuffed into the storage box. Holz used these ordinary equipment to modify a 2016 Honda Acura ILX (Acura ILX). According to Hotz, his driverless car is in good condition. Hotz also boasted that after several months of improvement and practice, the software that guides this modified version of Acura will surpass the constant-speed automatic driving module of the Tesla Model S (Tesla s) in terms of operational performance. Musk expressed his views to Hotz on the Tesla website. The original words are: It is relatively simple to achieve 99% accuracy of the machine learning system, but it is very difficult to get 0.9999% on this basis. This 0.9999% is the fundamental demand. Go to the annual machine vision competition to know the reason. The accuracy rate of computers in determining what is a dog can be as high as 99%, but it may occasionally mistake potted plants for dogs. If you make this mistake while driving at 70 miles per hour, the consequences will be very serious. Seeing this, Musk was still a rigorous engineering student at that time, and his words were not leaking, but when it was his turn to use MODEL to expand his business empire, what he said and what he did may not be the same thing, so Again, the man’s mouth… the ghost. Of course, from the description of this matter, there is still a lot of unknown information, such as: 1. What driving mode the vehicle was in at the time did not indicate whether the AP was turned on, whether it was in the following state or what. 2. The car owner naturally released the switch when he saw the traffic light, but did not say whether he would step on the brake. 3. Multiple rear-end collisions mean that the vehicle still has a tendency to accelerate after the first collision. This is like me (dog head forgiveness) when I used a mobile phone to accelerate on the wrong accelerator. Looking forward to taking a look at Tesla’s investigation report on the accident. The investigation report will contain detailed road conditions and videos at the time, as well as the acceleration and deceleration of the vehicle, and whether there is braking action. There is only one truth. Wait, there seems to be something wrong. This is no longer the first scene of the accident, and it is not the first time. Perhaps the result has come out long ago, and both parties are not satisfied (dog head).

sina156
8 months ago

There are problems on both sides. Tesla’s problem is: Tesla is now forced to start the energy recovery mode, which means that when you raise the gas pedal, there is a sense of deceleration and frustration. After getting used to this method, drivers who have been driving petrol cars for a long time just started Driving a Tesla does not adapt to this mode of operation, increasing misoperations, reducing driving comfort, and causing serious accidents; owners who buy Tesla usually have a petrol car at home, and the two operating logics of the two cars can easily lead to the owner. The driving muscle memory is confused (for example, when Tesla is used to raising the accelerator pedal to slow down, when the car needs to slow down, it only raises the accelerator first, which causes the braking process to prolong.) In fact, Tesla’s forced kinetic energy recovery The mode has changed the operating logic of driving (different from what was learned in the driving school). I think the transportation department should evaluate this approach, how much impact the mandatory start can recover on driving safety, after all, this OTA upgrade involves the two most important operating parts of the car’s brakes and accelerator. This accident is likely to be caused by the driver’s misoperation caused by the forced kinetic energy recovery mode. The owner did not say that stepping on the brakes in time and stepping on the brakes are invalid, but emphasized that the accelerator pedal was lifted for the first time to slow down and the operation was invalid. I had previously determined that my next car would be modle3 or Y, but if this problem cannot be solved, I would not consider Tesla again. After all, I will be able to repair both gas and electricity for at least 10 years in the future. I can’t guarantee that I will not make such mistakes in future driving and cause the brakes to be delayed. People who have driven for many years know how important it is to brake sooner or later!

yahoo898
8 months ago

Here is another answer: Is it realistic for Chinese taxis to choose Tesla? Okay! A certain Diaosi Fan was very interested. 1. After sitting in the taxi for one day, the vehicle suddenly shook violently. The man seemed to be nervous and asked the driver, what’s the matter with the swelling? Driver: Sit back, right? The space fork rocket technology used by our car trembles when the rocket is launched. It will be fine in a while. Sure enough, there was a false alarm, and the king calmly thought, after all, Tesla, the pioneer of science and technology, guarantees quality. I admire Musk even more. The US government’s investigation into Tesla’s front suspension safety issues involved 115,000 cars-Tesla Tesla Electric Car-cnBeta.COM2. He took a taxi for one day, and the car suddenly accelerated during driving. The king was shocked and asked the driver if he was swollen. What happened? Driver: Look at your nervousness. This is called full speed autonomous management, which is the same AI chip as the Falcon 9. Sure enough, there was another false alarm, and the king calmly thought, after all, Tesla, the pioneer of science and technology, guarantees quality. Worship Tesla even more. Tesla encounters acceleration failure again, and quality control is not in place after frequent exposure of accidents? 3. One day I took a taxi again. The man was watching the program on the screen, but suddenly the screen went black. The man was disappointed and asked the driver, what’s wrong with the swelling? Driver: The signal was interrupted just after passing through the plasma black barrier. Usually pay attention to science scores! Sure enough, it was still safe and sound, and he thought to himself, after all, Tesla, the pioneer of science and technology, guarantees quality. Please forgive me for being a tech noob. Tesla recalled 134,951 Model S and Model X 4 cars in the United States. Another day was rented out. Suddenly the skylight flew and the cool breeze came in. The gentleman panicked and asked the driver, “What’s wrong with the swelling?” Driver: Don’t be surprised, this is normal operation: throw the fairing. Sure enough, there was another false alarm, and the king calmly thought, after all, Tesla, the pioneer of science and technology, guarantees quality. Musk, please take my knees. The skylight can be tolerated, are we too tolerant to Tesla? 5. One day I got into the taxi again, and suddenly the trunk of the car caught fire while driving. The king screamed: Driver, what’s the matter with the swelling? Driver: Let’s have a secondary engine ignition. The king settled down, thinking that it might be another false alarm. Suddenly heard in the ear: Jump! what——-! The touch door failed. Then the king went to the sky to find the Tesla sports car in space. My daily analysis: spontaneous combustion accidents happen frequently, what happened to Tesla? Also: According to the news from the State Administration for Market Regulation on the evening of February 8, recently, the State Administration for Market Regulation and the Central Cyberspace Administration of China, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Transport, and the Fire Rescue Bureau of the Ministry of Emergency Management have reported abnormalities from consumers. Acceleration, battery fires, remote vehicle upgrade (OTA) and other issues jointly interviewed Tesla Motors (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., and asked them to strictly abide by Chinese laws and regulations, strengthen internal management, and implement the company The main responsibility for quality and safety, effectively safeguarding social public safety, and effectively protecting the legitimate rights and interests of consumers. Tesla was jointly interviewed by five departments and announced that it was buying bitcoin for $1.5 billion. The currency circle exploded five departments to treat guests. This salary is high! Female car owner, go to Tesla headquarters to make trouble!

leexin
8 months ago

This reminds me of the car accident that killed 2 people on Liangcheng Road in the magic city two days ago. I was spitting out with my colleagues. The driver was driving a BMW. Unfortunately, if he drives a Tes Pull, you can say that the car is out of control.

Think about it, if there is a Tesla in a car accident on Liangcheng Road, what would it be like to have a carnival for the whole network…

greatword
8 months ago

Let me say a few words. Under normal circumstances, third-party agencies will be asked to intervene in disputes to show justice. Moreover, the identification of the division of accident responsibility can also help to discuss the corresponding compensation issues according to the responsibility of each role in the accident. Therefore, the access of a third-party appraisal agency is necessary. I think it can not only be popularized, but also enforced when there is a disagreement. . Because if it is really a car issue, then it is not just a consumer, but a public safety issue. If the car owner is making trouble unreasonably, then this trend can also be suppressed. Smart cars are the future of cars. Intelligence means having certain control over the car to assist the driver in driving the car more safely, conveniently and easily. If something happens, the responsibility will be assigned to the car, which will undoubtedly hinder the development of the entire automobile industry. Then I saw some posts saying something about 315, I think there is no problem with 315 to defend rights, but there are a few premises. 1. Consumers’ demands are reasonable; 2. Normal complaint channels cannot achieve their goals; I have seen a lot of banners at auto shows. , Or complaints from the media, most of them belong to the above two types. Most of them are oil leaks, abnormal noises, abnormal gearboxes, etc. The traffic accident seems to be the first time I have seen it. The first feeling is that after experiencing several public opinion storms, Tesla seems to have gotten around, agreed to a third-party appraisal, and actively cooperated with the Market Supervision and Administration Bureau (it seems that the tea party of the five ministries and commissions a while ago did not go in vain). The reaction was a little bit. I had a good talk the day before and signed all the words, but the next day the style changed and the third-party agency was not allowed to appraise it. I am more curious about this, if as I said, the access of a third-party appraisal agency is obviously beneficial to me. After refusing to appraise and negotiate, bluntly use the media to force car companies to meet all their requirements, which is a bit of kidnapping the media. If everyone is like this, isn’t the media busy? Let me say that until a third-party appraisal agency has issued a conclusion, none of us will help! Who made the Internet wind turn so fast this year, the comment was not posted in the first second, and the face was beaten in the next second?

loveyou
8 months ago

At a speed of 118 yards, it is recommended to operate a distance of 100 meters. Have you done it? 30 years of driving experience is the same as that of a century-old shop. It’s very virtual. On the high-speed, it can reach 118 yards. Under the premise that the vehicle in front is moving at a high speed, for the old driver, the distance of 5 meters does not matter much. But instead of running on the national highway and waiting for the traffic lights in front of you, you can’t brake in advance at a speed of 118 yards? Data from Tesla showed that at 6:14:22, 36:21 on February 21, the vehicle speed was 118.5km/h, 23 seconds, 17 minutes, and the brakes were applied, and the speed dropped to 116km/h, 25 seconds, 87 minutes, and activation in 23 seconds, 38 minutes. After 27 seconds and 45 minutes of the vehicle’s ABS (brake system), the speed dropped to 48.5km/h. As an old driver, let me talk about my opinion: Under the premise of real data, from the data, it took 4 seconds for the vehicle to drop from 118km/h to 48km/h, indicating that the vehicle brake did not fail, but it was just due to insufficient distance between vehicles. /The braking distance is too long, causing a rear-end collision with the vehicle in front. Insufficient vehicle distance is your own reason. If the braking distance is too long, the reason is hard to say, but again, don’t rely too much on the ABS anti-lock brake system. It is just like a car’s airbag, just an auxiliary means, and the last Security barriers do not mean that they are 100% reliable. Even if the ABS is activated, if you have experience, you still have to shorten the braking distance with continuous point braking. Last reminder: Keep the distance between cars when the car is on the road! ! !

strongman
8 months ago

This is the consequence of Tesla’s continuous price cuts, and Tesla owners are seriously deteriorating. Those giant babies who insist on making troubles are justified by price cuts and become Tesla owners. Of course, before the matter has been investigated, I really cannot say that Tesla is okay. It’s just that in this matter, the car owner repeatedly made trouble, asking for return of the car + compensation for mental loss. In any case, it is Tesla’s steel that is enough to allow the owner’s family to escape and hit the concrete pier to stop. This car owner should thank Tesla. If it weren’t for this smart car, her family of four would be doomed. If that were the case, there would be no jumping around, and all rights would have to be defended in front of the Tesla store in full. Let’s take a look at her self-described incident. At that time, she ran at a speed close to 120KM/H on a national highway. The first time she saw a red light, she did not step on the brakes, but raised the accelerator. We all know that Tesla’s single-pedal mode is not a substitute for brakes, it’s just kinetic energy recovery, not to mention that the speed is so fast when something goes wrong. This is a speed that requires more than 50 meters of braking distance to depress the brakes. However, the owner’s old father did not step on the brakes and rushed directly to the vehicle in front. The traffic police judged that there is no problem at all. If you don’t step on the brakes to rear-end others, it is not what you are solely responsible for. Now that the traffic police has been condemned by the law, and the government mediation statement signed by herself has turned her face in denial, the owners of the two vehicles that caused losses in the accident did not mention a word in her speech, as if her father drove into a car. It’s air. The most unlucky right now is the two who were rear-end collisions. The ones who had the New Year’s Eve, couldn’t move a car, and couldn’t fix it even if they wanted to repair. This female car owner was able to roll around in front of the Tesla shop. It is estimated that the two who were chased were facing her. There is no three in one directly. It’s not my responsibility anyway, so why should I take care of it. Fortunately, China is now a society under the rule of law. It has long since passed the stage where the public security organs should strengthen law enforcement against such accidents. She is not satisfied with Tesla’s recommendation to go through formal legal procedures. Where should I go to sue? Where to report, run to the Tesla store and put the car at the door, pull the banner, and people sit up. This is not what it means to provoke trouble. If there is a dispute, you can go to normal channels to complain. Interference with social order will be severely punished by law. From my personal point of view, I admire the Tesla owner named Han Chao, even though he bought a second-hand Model S. When he discovered that the car had a major repair problem, he immediately saved the evidence and seized the scooter provided to him by Tesla, and directly sued. During the prosecution, the car was not used for delay, and the final compensation amount was also obtained by the court. stand by. Although Tesla was dissatisfied and initiated an appeal, judging from the current evidence, there are not many angles that are beneficial to Tesla. It is estimated that Tesla will definitely lose money after the second trial. High-quality car owners like Han Chao are the ones to deal with. Tesla’s positive answer, although his funds are limited, he bought a used car. And this kind of smashing and rolling gameplay is really a strange thing that only appeared after Tesla’s price cut. In the future, the high-end taste positioning will no longer exist, and the new owners will have no charm, and they are not grateful for the strong rigidity of the Tesla model 3 body. , Is a life-saving grace for a family of four; not to mention the law of respecting the law and abiding by the law and expressing their demands legally and reasonably. If she continues to make trouble, Tesla’s legal affairs may first sue her for the crime of picking and provoking trouble, because her provocation has nothing to do with rights protection and has gone beyond the scope of normal rights protection. Even if the follow-up proves that it is really Tesla’s fault, Tesla should lose money, she should go to jail, and truly achieve both without delay. And this is the real country under the rule of law, everyone is responsible for their actions, no one will pity you, giant baby!

stockin
8 months ago

I have a complete understanding of the entire accident and sorted out the existing information. 1. At about 18:00 on February 21, Ms. Zhang’s father rear-ended two cars at a traffic light while driving on National Highway 341, and finally hit the roadside concrete barrier to stop. Ms. Zhang stated that after her father raised the switch close to the traffic light, the vehicle did not decelerate, but accelerated instead. 2. The traffic police responsibility appraisal determined that the cause of the accident was that Mr. Zhang did not keep a safe distance leading to a rear-end collision, and Mr. Zhang was fully responsible. 3. The official background data of Tesla shows that the vehicle speed is 118.5KM/h before stepping on the brake pedal, the vehicle is braking, ABS works normally during braking, forward collision warning and AEB are both working normally, and the braking system is not working properly. See exception. 4. Tesla expressed its willingness to assist Ms. Zhang to complete the vehicle maintenance and insurance claims, which was rejected by Ms. Zhang. 5. On March 6, Ms. Zhang posted a seal on the roof of the car to defend her rights, demanding to return the car, compensation for mental damage, medical expenses, and lost work expenses. 6. Tesla repeatedly offered to pay the inspection fee to monitor the vehicle, but Ms. Zhang refused. 7. On the morning of March 9, the Market Supervision Bureau agreed to select a third-party monitoring technology agency under mediation, and then negotiated authentication matters and signed a coordination letter. 8. On the afternoon of March 9, Ms. Zhang continued to use the roof horn to defend her rights, demanding return of the car, compensation for mental damage, medical expenses, and lost work expenses, and refused to accept and approve any third-party monitoring results and did not accept any mediation. Based on the above information alone, there are still many doubts that are not enough to determine the true cause of the current accident. However, based on the description of Ms. Zhang and the background data provided by Tesla, there may be the following possibilities: 1. The owner lifted the switch before the accident. The vehicle accelerated to 118.5KM/h due to abnormal acceleration, and the owner stepped on the brake, but it was too late, causing the vehicle to rear-end. 2. Before the accident, the car owner lifted off the electric door, and the car was abnormally accelerated to 118.5KM/h. The car owner did not step on the brake. The car started to decelerate and brake due to the AEB function, but it was too late, causing the car to rear-end. 3. Before the accident, the owner of the car accelerated to 118.5KM/h, and the owner stepped on the brake, but it was too late, causing the car to rear-end. 4. Before the accident, the owner of the car accelerated to 118.5KM/h, and the owner did not step on the brake. The car started to decelerate and brake due to the AEB function, but it was too late, causing the car to rear-end. At the beginning, Ms. Zhang agreed to select a third-party monitoring technology agency to monitor the vehicle. Later, she suddenly repented and behaved suspiciously. There are two possibilities for blind guessing. The first is that she lied, and she was afraid that there was no problem with the brake. It is worried that the third-party monitoring agency also obtains data from Tesla’s back office, and there is still the possibility of changing the data. Therefore, the following points need to be clarified. 1. Ms. Zhang only said that the speed of the car did not drop but increased after the father lifted the switch. Did the father step on the brake? 2. Tesla only talked about the vehicle speed before stepping on the brake pedal, so what was the vehicle speed when Mr. Zhang lifted off the accelerator pedal? 3. Was the AP turned on before the vehicle accident, and what is the specific driving mode? What is the intensity of energy recovery? At present, the background data of new energy vehicles are to be uploaded to the national regulatory platform simultaneously. In short, whether it is Tesla or a third-party organization, it is hoped that the true cause of the entire accident can be restored as soon as possible and the public can be explained. If it is a Tesla problem, the compensation should be compensated, the rectification should be made, and the safety problems have emerged one after another, can it be invited out of the Chinese market; if it is due to the personal reasons of the car owner, a certain penalty should be given to avoid “the bigger the trouble, the more “The more” the malicious touch of porcelain disrupts the market order.

11
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x