In the case of defendant Wang Xiaojian’s intentional homicide, the Supreme People’s Court recently approved the death sentence of defendant Wang Xiaojian in accordance with the law. On January 28, 2021, in accordance with the execution order issued by the Supreme People’s Court, the Intermediate People’s Court of Shangrao City, Jiangxi Province executed the criminal Wang Xiaojian in accordance with the law.

The trial found that the defendant Wang Xiaojian’s daughter He XX and the victim Liu XX (died 9 years old) were classmates of the Fifth Primary School in Shangrao City. While the two were at the same table, He XX repeatedly reported to his parents that he was “bullyed” by Liu XX. On May 9, 2019, after Wang Xiaojian learned that He Moumou was “bullyed” by Liu Moumou again, he sent a group message to question Liu Moumou on the class WeChat. Teacher Wang, the head teacher, and Liu XX’s father, Liu, both responded positively. Liu also apologized to Wang Xiaojian. After unsuccessfully adding Wang Xiaojian’s WeChat account, he communicated with Wang Xiaojian’s wife He Mou on WeChat. That night, after Mr. Wang learned that Wang Xiaojian was irritable during the conversation with He, at the request of He, he told Liu’s parents not to meet and communicate with Wang Xiaojian, and that he would change seats to resolve the matter. At around 7:40 the next day, Liu sent Liu to the school and left, and kept communicating with He on WeChat, telling He that this matter has been actively dealt with, and Liu will apologize to He and the head teacher has agreed to adjust the seat. At about 8:22, Wang Xiaojian sent He XX to school because he did not wait for Liu XX’s parents at the school gate. When He called to inform that the matter had been coordinated and resolved and asked his daughter to go to class, he still insisted on sending He to home and bought a slaughter knife halfway through. At about 9:12, Wang Xiaojian returned to the school with a slaughter knife. In the teacher’s office, he saw that only He Mou was communicating with the teacher Wang, that is, he rushed into the classroom of the third grade class in the small class from the back door, and had been changed seats and sat alone. Stabbed Liu’s chest, abdomen, back buttocks, etc. in the last row of the classroom with more than a dozen knives, and then took Liu who fell out of the classroom and threw it on the corridor, causing Liu’s abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava to rupture , A lot of blood loss and death. Later, Wang Xiaojian sat on the steps of the school playground with a knife until the police arrested him.The Supreme People’s Court reconsidered that the defendant Wang Xiaojian deliberately and illegally deprived others of his life, and his actions constituted the crime of intentional homicide. Wang Xiaojian couldn’t rationally treat and deal with the friction between his daughter and classmates. In order to vent his anger, he broke into the school classroom with a knife and killed the 9-year-old victim on the spot. The criminal methods were extremely cruel, the social impact was extremely bad, and the social harm was great. Although he did not leave the scene after committing the crime and waited for the arrest by the public security personnel, he had surrendered himself, but the crime was extremely serious and not enough to be given a light punishment. The facts ascertained in the first instance judgment and the second instance ruling are clear, the evidence is reliable and sufficient, the conviction is accurate, and the sentence is appropriate. The trial procedure was legal. Accordingly, the Supreme People’s Court ruled and approved the death sentence of the defendant Wang Xiaojian.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
heloword
7 months ago

It has only been a few months? The public has forgotten things to this extent. Court documents cannot write the verdict that boys bullied girls all the time. The first party information for this matter is the parent WeChat group. The girl’s parents threatened the boy directly. The content is that boys bully girls all the year round, girl mothers and girl fathers have directly contacted the boys themselves. But ineffective. The boy’s father expressed his ignorance in the group.

helpyme
7 months ago

The teacher said he didn’t know in the group. In the matter, the reporter interviewed the woman’s grandpa. The grandpa said that the boy beat the girl many times, and the girl cried every day when she went home. Other classmates circumstantial evidence that the boy bullied the girl and the girl’s parents had directly looked for the boy. In addition, the teacher is not unaware. It is not the truth in the group to say ignorance. On the same day, the teacher asked the parents of both parties to solve the problem, and then listened to the views of the girl’s mother, but did not let the boy’s parents go to meet, for fear of accident. The girl’s parents are completely out of control. In addition, one background is that boys’ parents are doctors, girls’ families resign, and girls’ fathers are unstable. This incident is a tragedy in which long-term school bullying has intensified conflicts and led to extreme events. There is a girl from a poor family who was bullied at school.

sina156
7 months ago

The girl’s parents tried to solve the problem many times. From normal logic, this matter. Find the teacher first, then the parents. The girl’s mother directly talked to a 9-year-old child, indicating that the normal resolution channels had failed. After the normal channels are resolved, the boy still bullies the girl. The girl’s father also talked to a 9-year-old child, and this was already a threat. But after looking for it, a 9-year-old boy still bullied the girl without any fear. Are the boy’s parents really ignorant? Is the teacher unaware of this kind of long-term bullying and the contradiction between girls’ parents directly looking for boys? The girl’s parents tore their faces and send threats directly to the parents, which is directly desperate to the teacher.

yahoo898
7 months ago

At this time, it is already very dangerous. The girl’s father has been on the verge of collapse under long-term grievances. At this time, the teacher asked both parents to meet, and then asked the boy parents to avoid it (the head teacher said that the girl’s mother raised it, but the boy’s father and the girl’s mother directly WeChat, and the girl’s mother said it’s not good not to meet, and the teacher may be lying again). The girl’s father is desperate to solve the problem. The logic is so simple that the girl will not be bullied after the murder. If the girl’s father is normal, there is a simple solution to this matter. The teacher does not care, find the principal, the principal does not care. Threatened to go to the office of the Director of Education and Sports Bureau, so that the principal was scolded and the teacher was put on shoes. Solve the problem of girls being bullied without killing.

leexin
7 months ago

Life is precious. The bear children in elementary school did such a thing and finally received this result. More or less, I think it really cannot be punished. If you could change positions earlier, or apologize and promise, you could solve the problem and change the result, but the teacher came too late, and the other parent came too late. The result has become the price of life. This kind of result…the love of a child, everyone has it. I admit that every parent definitely loves their children. Some bear kids, sometimes talk about it, maybe they can really repent. After all, they are still small, and there are still many opportunities for change. Their current three views and understanding of the world still have a great opportunity to change. Even if the teaching is fruitless, we still have other ways to choose. And seeing it from life and death is really extreme. Sometimes I want to say a few more words, but the reality is already in front of me. We love our child deeply, to protect her, to love her. But protection is not about destroying those who hurt her, but love is not about doing extreme things in the name of loving her. That might also leave a greater shadow on your children.

greatword
7 months ago

Rather than treating this incident as a law popularization case, it is better to use it as a warning case of campus bullying. Wang’s behavior is sinful, but don’t forget how the evil cause is planted. I sincerely hope that after tragedies, school bullying can attract the attention of schools, teachers, and parents of abusers. This matter is by no means as simple as the news narrative. If it’s just a simple bullying, what’s the point? If you are persuaded to stop in time for the first time and the second time, why is this? If the teacher pays attention to it early and solves it early, why is this? If the parents of boys can pay attention to it early and do a good job in education, what is the point? I am not condemning the victims, little girls are also victims. Everything is a causal cycle.

loveyou
7 months ago

The death penalty is naturally the most correct thing. This matter has no value in fatherly discussion. At that time, Jason Statham protected his daughter and ex-wife, and short video clips of fat beating bullies became popular online. No one noticed that in the movie clip, he just clicked. When this case happened, I heard a voice saying that if it were my daughter, I would do the same. This matter is transferred to some narrow-minded people, who often have extremely selfish prejudices, in order to cause serious life harm to others, so as to achieve their own extraordinary personal emotional heroism image of a wife-loving madman and a female madman . When we output emotions and condemn the murderer’s criminal behavior, public opinion condemns it, and in the murderer’s cognition, he himself is realizing the so-called love value that we once climaxed and cheered.

strongman
7 months ago

The death penalty is a punishment for cruel and selfish crimes, and it is also a warning. When the sinful life comes to an end, he deserves it, but don’t rush to cheer. We have created too many extreme moral emotions in the past, and we will face many negatives in the future. Extremely sinful error. When egoism begins to get younger and younger, society needs to rationally discern the protection of its own rights and interests, rather than cry out for self-rights in tearing voices.

stockin
7 months ago

To add more details to friends: On May 10, 2019, a 9-year-old boy was stabbed to death by the father of a girl in his class at the No. 5 Primary School in Shangrao, Jiangxi. The case shocked the society. The case that has received much attention now has new developments. Today (February 20), a reporter learned on the official website of Shangrao Intermediate People’s Court that on January 28, 2021, in accordance with the execution order issued by the Supreme People’s Court, the Shangrao Intermediate People’s Court in accordance with the law in the case of criminal Wang Moujian The death penalty was executed. Before the execution of the death penalty, the court arranged for Wang Moujian to meet with close relatives according to law.

zhiwo
7 months ago

According to the report, the Supreme People’s Court reconsidered that the defendant Wang Moujian deliberately and illegally deprived others of his life, and his actions constituted the crime of intentional homicide. Wang Moujian could not rationally treat and deal with the friction between his daughter and classmates. He broke into the school class to vent his anger and committed a knife attack. The 9-year-old victim died on the spot. The criminal method was extremely cruel, and the social impact was extremely bad. Big. Although he did not leave the scene after committing the crime and waited for the arrest by the public security personnel, he had surrendered himself, but the crime was extremely serious and not enough to be given a light punishment. The facts ascertained in the first instance judgment and the second instance ruling are clear, the evidence is reliable and sufficient, the conviction is accurate, and the sentence is appropriate. The trial procedure was legal. Accordingly, the Supreme People’s Court ruled that the defendant Wang Moujian was sentenced to death.

11
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x