On March 23, the Chinese and Russian foreign ministers jointly declared: 1. All human rights are universal, indivisible and interrelated. 2. Democracy is one of the achievements of human development. Its symbol is to ensure that power belongs to the people in the form of legislation, that is, citizens have the right to manage state affairs and exercise power legally. 3. International law is the cornerstone of the development of human society. 4. The international community should adhere to the principles of open, equal, and non-ideological multilateralism, jointly respond to global challenges and threats, strive to maintain the authority of the multilateral system, improve the effectiveness of the multilateral system, and improve the global governance system. Maintain peace and strategic stability, promote the development of human civilization, and ensure that all countries enjoy the fruits of development on an equal footing.
It’s not complicated, but it’s actually the revival of the land power state. Some theories are always old, but they are better, such as McKinder’s World Island. China and Russia have to unite. It is very likely that China, Russia, Europe and India will have to unite, because each other’s expansion on the Eurasian continent has reached its limit. Really let China annex Southeast Asia, Russia annex Central Asia, EU annex Balkans, and India annex Pakistan. Guess what these four brothers are doing? Ability to be sick. Having entered modern society, the powerful countries would rather be scumbags. Resources, trade, and cheap labor are needed, and the management agency keeps the social governance of education, governance, and security, and says goodbye. Regardless of whether C is born. This is called the limit of expansion. You no longer want to increase your own social governance costs. Your own nationals have already made you very irritable. You are thirsty for growth and look for markets everywhere, whether it is our manufacturing capacity or Lao Maozi’s energy. Therefore, these four brothers must cooperate with each other basically. Russia’s industrial decline, the EU’s negative interest rates, China’s overcapacity, India’s overpopulation, there is still a way out for cooperation, and mutual fighting can only exacerbate conflicts. Regardless of the fact that the EU has jumped a lot in the past two days, what is it? Something has stopped the China-EU Investment Agreement. In the third quarter of last year, your EU government debt ratio has reached 97.3% (to GDP), and you can’t breathe again. Why does Merkel try to promote China-EU cooperation? People really have the ideal of Greater Europe (approximately equal to Greater Germany), and they are looking for transactions and assets everywhere to assign value to the euro (new mark). Moreover, the cooperation of these four companies is not enough, and they have to jointly expand their respective spheres of influence. China wants Southeast Asia, the crossroads of the Asia-Pacific economy, Russia wants pricing power in the international energy market, the European Union wants investment access in global emerging markets, India wants…India, as long as it invests at this stage, it does not yet have that ambitious goal. Who owns the things that China, Russia and Europe want? In the hands of the most powerful sea power country, the American emperor. At the peak, there were nearly 3,000 overseas military bases, and now there are nearly 800 covering 70 countries, controlling the world’s major trade and logistics channels, mastering a large number of raw material pricing rights, and controlling the market access of a large number of countries, the United States. Taiying counts, anyhow, there are 145 overseas military bases in 42 countries, the afterglow of the empire. Adding this family background and the American imperial’s, it’s still very scary. In the real situation, for Yusanjia (India a little bit later), it is a math problem that is not related to the ideological feathers. Why does China always invest in East and South Africa, while showing some restraint in some countries in West Africa? Because France has soldiers in Ivory Coast, Gabon and Senegal; why can France always talk about the US imperialism’s Middle East policy? Because France has a garrison in the UAE. Without France, how can your EU have the basic courage to invest in Iran and make Paris and Frankfurt the “EU new financial center”? But, the shackles on the Yusanjia (held in the hands of the U.S. Emperor) are quite heavy. With NATO and SWIFT (International Settlement System) in place, long live the EU if it can achieve factual neutrality. As for the stinking remarks in order to cater to the US imperialism, yes; Russia is still lying on the Soviet heritage, but Putin and the Slavists have tried their best to preserve a basic board. The east did not sign the post-World War II peace treaty with Japan, the west did not loosen the East Uzbekistan, and the south was still working hard to counter Turkey, which was considered to have achieved a lot of local advantages when resources were scarce. Although the whole is still in decline…it is really China that can significantly break through the shackles in some parts, and the US imperialism that has held back the Western Pacific “has 70% of China.” We have become the most hopeful link in the chain of blockade of the world island by sea power nations. If it is better, it may be the “beginning of the beginning”. Therefore, China and Russia, which are the most independent, must stand together. This is in line with the most basic national interests of both parties. By expressing a clear attitude of non-confrontation between China and Russia and a strong willingness to cooperate, it can stabilize the eastern part of the world island and set a good example for Europe, which is gagged and bound by tortoise shells. Brother, you have to insist on factual neutrality. We know that your chain is tight, but you have to understand that the three major sectors of Russia, Europe, China and Europe can no longer be confronted and consumed, and you can’t afford to consume China and Russia. The fact that Europe is neutral in fact means that we have more investment and technology transfer, and our pressure is less; when Europe reduces NATO’s investment in East Uzbekistan, the pressure on the old man can also be less. If the U.S. imperialism wants to make up for these lazy places in Europe, the pressure on the U.S. imperialism will continue to increase. Regardless of whether it is the expansion of the U.S. Empire, or the allies and servants who lie down for money, in short, the cost of the U.S. Empire on the edge of the world island must rise and exceed the benefits as much as possible. Can withstand the high-frequency and low-intensity seesaw, without triggering a local war in the Sino-Russian economic hinterland, and finally break the US imperial contract, even if it is an epic victory. It is not easy, but fate has turned to this page in history, and we can only hold our breath.