Yesterday, a Tianjin netizen posted an article saying, “I saw the old man fell and did not get up. The old man passed away a few days later, and I am very self-blaming.” The article roughly explained the psychological journey and the incident.
Because the authenticity of the question is doubtful, thank you friends
From the perspective of being responsible for friends, I once again met with Mr. Xiao Zhong, the person involved in this incident. The following is an overview of chat content:
- The incident did not happen recently. It was the fact that the person concerned had seen similar news recently that triggered memories, and expressed feelings about the incident.
- The pictures are not live pictures, because the parties did not take pictures of the scene, so the pictures are copied from news of similar events.
- The incident occurred in Muli, Dabizhuang, Dongli District, Tianjin. The specific address, time, and building section of the incident have been verified and will not be handled publicly for the purpose of protecting the parties.
- Self-blame is very easy, self-reflection is also very easy, but it is really not easy to help. Peng Yu’s case will not be discussed. If it is bad, it is ugly. Peng Yu only lost more than 40,000 yuan, although he was stunned. , It consumes countless energy and time, but after all, the person is alive but there is a girl. After helping the old man, she was dragged and said that she hit it. Under the pressure of the elderly’s family and his parents, he finally jumped into the river and committed suicide. Is it she? Does it matter if she hits? Even if she hits it, she doesn’t have to pay for her life, isn’t it? So I would rather blame ourselves and reflect on it instead of taking our lives to help the elderly. We can also say that we are still very poor and can’t afford to support tens of thousands of people. , In the end, the old man was fine, and he had to die, so it was enough for someone to call 120. It was good. I saw in the comments that some people said that the truth is unknown. Is there the truth in the Peng Yu case? Most of the cases of helping the elderly have no truth. , If there is the truth, is it still called the Peng Yu case? Old lady Xu died four years after the incident. She always believed that Peng Yu hit her. Peng Yu finally chose to lose money in the second trial. He never admitted to hitting someone. It’s because the matter has gotten big, and someone actually helped him admit that he had hit someone? What? The first transcript at the time of the incident was strangely lost, but all this is not important, because the Peng Yu case is not a solitary case, and at least large and small cases can be found. Hundreds of cases, thousands of cases, and a few of them are under surveillance that can restore the innocence of the victim? Even if the innocence is restored, can the elderly be prosecuted for fraud? After the Peng Yu case, I specially checked the relevant laws for a few days. The surprising result is that, except for “It was not you who hit, why did you need to help”, the judge in question cannot be counted as wrong. The judge does not need both parties to prove whether there was a collision, but based on the principle of fairness or the principle of probability. Let Peng Yu pay compensation and it is the most terrible thing, because according to the law, as long as the moment you support you, there is no way to prove your innocence, and you are already in trouble! The most terrible thing in the world is not an unjust case, but a correct judgment. Mistaken things and said them in vernacular that everyone can understand