Warning: sizeof(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/helpmekim2dhsefl3pwmseak8ismo2/wwwroot/wp-content/plugins/ad-injection/ad-injection.php on line 824 Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/helpmekim2dhsefl3pwmseak8ismo2/wwwroot/wp-content/plugins/ad-injection/ad-injection.php on line 831

I have a Ford Fiesta 1.5L and a Honda XRV1.5T. I only judge from the driving experience of these two cars. After all, regardless of the brand, gearbox and tuning capabilities, the difference between the engine and turbocharger alone is not rigorous. Carnival: It’s really fast to accelerate from 0 after starting. It’s really cool to follow the power where the accelerator is stepped on. After all, the car is small, the American engine is tuned, the DSG dual clutch, the power output is simple and violent. Disadvantages, after all, cars with less than 100,000 have obvious noise. At high speeds up to 120 yards, you can feel that the power is not enough, and the car is not stable enough because of the wheelbase. It’s a small car suitable for urban driving, haha. XRV: Forgive my budget, I can only afford it when I change a car. And because of this, it happens to answer this question. Honda’s engine is equipped with a CVT continuously variable transmission. CVT is not suitable for short-term load-carrying of large forces. Steel belts will have an impact. Japanese cars’ tuning tends to be fuel-efficient and resistant. These two main reasons lead to The car started softly and slowly. So don’t think that the whole driving process with a turbocharger is better than that without a turbocharger. In addition, let’s talk about the intervention of turbocharging, as long as the car is involved in a higher speed. Some brands of cars have early intervention and perfect tuning. As a car owner, you can feel that the car is very smooth and the whole driving experience is good. The specific models are no longer called, the province said that I advertise. As for the XRV, I can only say that this car drove 130 yards. If you continue to step on the accelerator, it will also give you a good acceleration and driving experience. Finally, there is a question. There is a difference between 1.5L and 1.5T. The big difference is not seen in the content above. As for where the difference comes from, in many ways, don’t just look at the engine.

zhiwo

By zhiwo

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
helpmekim
8 months ago

I haven’t driven 1.5L and 1.5T, but I have driven 1.6L and 1.6T. The 1.6L is the logo my dad bought in 2008. It has 117 horsepower and 150 Nm. The maximum power output speed is 6000, 1.6T. The one I bought in 20 years is 4008, 170 horsepower 250 Nm, maximum power output speed 5500. When running at 1.6l and running at high speed, the speed is generally up to 3200 when the fifth gear is around 110. At the same time, the engine noise is relatively loud, and the speed increase is relatively slow when you continue to step on the accelerator. It makes you feel more strenuous for this nose, roar, but speed It just can’t go up; but when the 1.6T speed is 120, the speed is about 2200 in sixth gear. Of course, this is also related to the gear position. If you continue to step on the accelerator and the gearbox downshifts and pulls the speed, the car speed will go up. Although the engine sound will be louder, it won’t die like the roaring sound of 1.6L. When driving in a city, the main difference between 1.6L and 1.6T lies in overtaking. 1.6L overtaking belongs to the kind of slow and unhurried overtaking. It is necessary to step on the accelerator like a 1.6T car overtaking, which means supercharged engine. The disadvantage is that the power will be lagging. It is not the kind of power that comes when you move your foot. The power output is particularly abrupt when you step on the accelerator. Therefore, there is a difference between 1.5l and 1.5t, the difference that can be clearly perceived in daily life.

heloword
8 months ago

Very big. Quite different things. My family has a 1.4Lpolo, and my brother-in-law has a 1.4T Magotan. The power is nearly twice as bad! I own a 2.0TS3, and my little brother has a 2.0L Angkesaila. It took me more than 0.4 seconds, and his ten seconds went away. . . The self-priming thing knows that the poor ratio is blowing, the real high-displacement self-priming, they can’t afford it, not to say that the large-displacement self-priming is not good, but the large-displacement booster is more fragrant, and the same row Pressure is better than self-absorption! Self-priming in supercars nowadays are all sentimental models, the main models are still supercharged. Please feel free to use the essentials, you are all right.

helpyme
8 months ago

The difference is big. Take Yinglang as an example. The 1.3T has 163 horses and 230 Nm, the acceleration is more than 8 seconds, and the 1.5L 110 horses are about 150 Nm (maybe not accurate, roughly the same), zero hundred Accelerating for more than 12 seconds, the difference is close to 4 seconds, it is not a car. It doesn’t make much difference to buy food and vegetables, but you need to overtake on a high speed. One is directly overtaking with a kick of the accelerator, and the other is humming for a long time. I didn’t exceed it and I came back!

sina156
8 months ago

The difference is quite big. After changing from naturally aspirated to supercharged intake, more torque and maximum power will be obtained. However, two seconds before the start, due to blocked intake and exhaust, and adjustment of the ignition advance angle and compression ratio, the power output is not as good as the self-priming state. . The picture below is the information I found on the XCP website last year. XCP has a feature. When the test vehicle is accelerating at zero, it will occasionally take an idling start and a catapult start for comparison. Catapult start — the turbine runs at full speed without any delay, and the maximum acceleration is reached at the start; idling start—the maximum acceleration is reached after 1.2 seconds. In the first second, regardless of whether the 1.5T Binzhi is idling or ejecting, it is not as fast as a direct idling start (Fit has a lower vehicle weight and a starting acceleration of 0.53g, which is likely to slip). In the second second, the Binzhi at idle start The speed of the smart car is still not as fast as that of the fit; the speed of Binzhi, which started from the ejection, surpassed the fit. At idle speed, the acceleration at full throttle is directly proportional to the displacement. The 2.0 Teana of the “weak chicken” relies on a 500ml single cylinder capacity, and the start at idle speed is an acceleration of 0.41g. Turbochargers can increase the power level of the engine, but there is no comprehensive rolling plan in the project, and there are gains and losses.

yahoo898
8 months ago

Depending on the thrust-to-weight ratio and the gearbox matching, the Fit 1.5 high-speed 120 is 2200 rpm, and the Lynk & Co 03’s 1.5T high-speed 120 is 2180 rpm, and the acceleration of these two cars is close to 100 kilometers. I actually feel that the acceleration is not much different. So there is no absolute meat or no meat, and it can be scary to push the weight compared to go kart. Of course, there is still a difference between the Fit full load and the 03 full load. In the final analysis, it is more important than the dominant factor.

leexin
8 months ago

Motivation is not needed after no one has experienced it. In the past, it was often said that the high-speed speed limit was 120, and the expressway speed limit was 80. Any car can reach the speed limit. This is actually the case. It saves the road conditions. There are often big cars in front of the single lane, and cars from the opposite side continue to come over, self-priming and stepping to the end. It seems that the time is not enough, and I have no confidence to overtake. Some people will say that I follow the car normally, what kind of car to overtake. It is really dangerous to follow a big car, and it is easy to break the front windshield. If it is the same car body with T, you may be able to quickly overtake and change lanes with a little more fuel. The same goes for high-speed roads. Two lanes, large cars on the right are occupied, and from time to time they will change to overtaking on the left, or there are cars on the left that occupy about 100 lanes. If it is a car with a T, the speed can be increased in an instant. Around 120, pass quickly. But self-absorption is really not confident. Before, the 2.0 self-priming nature was basically used, and the 2.4 self-priming Accord was on high speed. If you don’t need to cruise at a fixed speed (basically, you can’t use it for the whole journey). It’s basically half-foot oil to 120, and it’s tired after a long time. Later, driving a 2T Mondeo was different, just a little bit.

greatword
8 months ago

The difference is big, the same as 1.5 displacement, but the cylinder block strength, crankshaft strength and accessories are different in all aspects. The only thing they have in common is the displacement. 1.5T should be about the same power level as 2.4L self-priming. 1.0T is the same power level as 1.5L self-priming. It is meaningless to compare two engines with different power levels. Because of the cost, all aspects of maintenance are also completely different. But you said that self-priming must be worse than the turbo power level, I don’t agree. The power characteristics of the two are different. The turbo has forced air intake, so the twisting comes earlier, and it feels like a light step on the accelerator is very powerful. But its torque is a platform, and it will not increase as you step deeper. Self-priming is naturally aspirated, and its torque is a rising parabola. Therefore, the self-priming below 2000 rpm has no power and requires a deep throttle. The self-priming reaches 4000 5000 rpm and it has power. Therefore, the power of the self-priming engine is high. Really high rotation, small displacement turbines are not necessarily better than self-priming. Of course, the comparison between self-priming and turbo should be the same grade, not the same displacement. It should be 1.5T and 2.4L compared to 1.0T and 1.5L.

loveyou
8 months ago

Let me start with the conclusion: the difference is quite big. I have a Baojun 360, and I often use Trumpchi GS5/GM6 for work reasons. Let’s compare these two cars and engines. The turbo pressure of Trumpchi 4A15 is about 1500-1600 rpm, but for the same 120 km cruise, the GS5 6th gear speed is about 2000-2200 rpm, and the GM6 6th gear is 2400-2600 rpm. The power for emergency overtaking is still sufficient. Baojun’s 1.5L2B, with 5-speed AMT, the high-speed 120 speed is 3500-3800, the lack of power is obvious during emergency overtaking. Turbo lag is still there, everyone is 1.5, but 360 is more than 200 kilograms lighter than Gs5 and Gm6. A few meters before the start of the traffic light, 360 will definitely take the lead, and Trumpchi will definitely overtake after the turbo is depressurized. The fuel consumption, I personally think, are almost the same, the fuel consumption can go to 11L per 100 kilometers with the air conditioner + 360 city road conditions, and the two Trumpchis are not much better.

strongman
8 months ago

My family happens to have a 1.5L Toyota Chihyun and a 1.5T Honda. The difference is very big. Toyota Chihyun lowers the adjustment and turns on the air conditioner. The power drops greatly, and the air conditioner has to be overtaken. It is uncomfortable to start with four people. This is still very light. Under narrow conditions. For Honda, the car weighs several hundred kilograms and the tires are much wider. There is no obvious power drop when the air conditioner is turned on. Overtaking is completed with one kick. I feel that there is a big contrast between a 10-year-old and a 15-year-old.

stockin
8 months ago

Before the intervention of the turbine, the power of the 1.5L is greater, because the 1.5T turbine has not started to work, and the output power is lower than without the turbine. After the turbine intervenes and speeds up, the 1.5T torque is greater, the acceleration is faster, the maximum power is also higher, and the maximum speed that can be reached is also greater. According to the different manufacturers’ adjustments and power versions, it is approximately equivalent to 1.8 to 2.4 liters. The displacement.

11
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x