The reporter learned from Tangshan City Government that after the death of truck driver Jin Deqiang taking pesticides in Fengrun District of Tangshan City on April 5, 2021, Tangshan City immediately formed a joint investigation involving public security, disciplinary inspection, transportation, health, and judicial departments. The group conducted an in-depth investigation in accordance with laws and regulations.

It is reported that on April 5, Jin Deqiang drove a truck into the guard box at the Zhichao Station in Jiangjiaying, Fengrun District, to undergo a joint road police inspection. Law enforcement officers found that the truck’s Beidou positioning system was not operating online and was suspected of violating relevant road transportation regulations. They guided the vehicle to the Zhichao Station for suspension in accordance with the law, and informed Jin Deqiang to go to the Zhichao Station License Office for further verification. Jin Deqiang did not go to the license room for verification immediately, but left the scene on his own. After investigation, it was discovered that he went to a nearby supply and marketing agency to buy pesticides, and returned to the Supermarket Control Station to consult the illegal behavior penalty standard at the license office window. According to the “Hebei Province Road Transport Regulations”, the staff told him that similar illegal cases were fined 2,000 yuan after verification. During the consultation period, no punishment has been implemented, neither party has excessive words or deeds, nor has any verbal or physical conflicts occurred. Without warning, he took out the pre-purchased pesticide from his pants pocket and drank it quickly. After the staff of the license office discovered that the unknown liquid that Jin Deqiang drank was pesticide, they called the police and dialed the emergency number 120. The people present immediately rushed him to the hospital, where the hospital tried its best to rescue him, but the treatment failed. Combined with the hospital’s clinical examination and diagnosis, the public security agency determined that Jin Deqiang committed suicide by taking a large dose of “Di Cao Kuai” pesticide, and his family had no objection to this.

After the incident, relevant departments of Tangshan City accompanied the family members to the site of the incident to view the entire video data, truthfully informed the family members of the investigation results of the public security organs and relevant departments, and assisted the family members in handling the aftermath in a timely manner. (Bohai News Network)

zhiwo

By zhiwo

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
helpmekim
6 months ago

Don’t complain, don’t scold the street, don’t stand in line, just talk about this survey report from a professional perspective. When working as an investigative reporter, there is a requirement that the content of your article must first have key information, and second, have a clear source of information. If you go to check a store that sells fakes, you must explain how it is sold and how to check the authenticity. Then there must be a source for every sentence you say. It was what you saw with your own eyes, the shop owner said it, was it written in the inspection report, or was it said by the onlookers. You have to make it clear where each information you say comes from. Come back to this report. I agree with the point in the other answers that suicide in this matter is the result but not the key. The key lies in whether the punishment is reasonable and whether there are violations of both parties. The 2000-5000 fine was based on the Hebei Road Transportation Regulations, which was to damage the forgery, tampering, etc., and impose a fine of 2000-5000. The key to the investigation is whether there is man-made sabotage. The core of the entire investigation report should focus on this point, and it turns out that nothing is mentioned. There are also rescue matters. When you find that you drink the medicine, you should call the police in time. Then be clear, when you drink, when you call the police, when you call 120, and when the ambulance arrives. I didn’t say this. Let’s talk about the source of information. What is the source of the situation described in it? Was it dictated by law enforcement officers, or was it recorded by on-site law enforcement. Judging from the statement in the notification, the description of the punishment and rescue process is very confirming, that is to say, the inspection team believes that this is the fact. Then the determination of this fact is based on dictation by law enforcement officers? Or a text description? Or live video? Or are there other witness statements? Again, I am not questioning someone lying, I just question the unprofessional nature of this report. The police will issue investigative reports on hot issues. The better impression is the case of Kunshan’s anti-killing of Brother Long. If you are interested, you can go and see how the report was written.

heloword
6 months ago

The satellite receiver is not online, the driver is not the main responsibility, because he is not a “road transport operator”. As long as a truck is on the road, as long as there is no overloading or violation of the Road Traffic and Transportation Law, the driver has no responsibility to be held. The management responsibility of the transportation company should be held. If the responsible party didn’t understand it, unfortunate things happened. As for the driver’s fatigue driving, obtaining evidence through online monitoring can only be used as an auxiliary monitoring method for business activities, rather than a sharp sword hanging over the driver’s head. The intent of the online monitoring policy is good. It is to ensure the safety of the life and property of the driver and other people. The monitoring should first be restricted to the transportation company, not directly to the driver (non-operating vehicles are not installed, indicating that it is aimed at Business unit). Because the drivers are relatively weak, they can’t generally refuse the overload and over-working hours dispatched by the company. This matter originally had nothing to do with the driver, but the relatively strong position of the transportation company actually left it to the driver to handle it. Local over-limit checkpoints are driven by fines to generate revenue. They may also turn good policies into bad ones in their operations, and fines them the first time they are discovered, instead of punishing transport units after repeated instruction. The personal family pressure of the driver is high. There are old people and children who need to support and raise them. They work hard for a long time, but there is absolutely no need for them to come out on their own! It was guessed that he intended to seek justice for the majority of truck drivers by drinking pesticides, but he did not expect that the pesticides were too toxic, and he was not able to return to the world. He accidentally turned into deadly remonstrance. I feel very sorry for the driver friend, this should be regarded as a wrong case! According to the law, there is no actual illegal behavior in the over-limit station, the fine has not been received, the fine bill has not been issued, and there is no formal administrative penalty notice and detention document, and there is no way to be held accountable.

helpyme
6 months ago

My question is simple. In my opinion, it is not the point of suicide. If the law enforcement officers violated the law, or there is a problem with the law, then even if the driver did not commit suicide, the law enforcement officer should be sanctioned; but if there is no problem with the law, The law enforcement officers also enforce the law normally. The driver has violated the regulations. What about your suicide? Those who commit suicide in violation of the law should be condemned, and their families should not receive any compensation. Don’t tell me anything about the dead or the living. Everything is based on facts. Right or wrong is wrong. I read the law and said that it was a fine of 2000 for deliberately shielding or damaging the navigator. There is nothing wrong with this provision. For deliberately shielding damage and refusing to accept supervision, I think the fine of 2000 is still light. What I see on the Internet is that truck drivers can’t control the navigator at all, and it has nothing to do with the driver when the navigator is disconnected. The implication is that there is no intentional shielding or damage by the driver. The driver’s suicide note also says so. So this matter is very simple, the only key point is how the law enforcement officer determines that the driver deliberately shielded or damaged. If the quality of the navigator is the problem, the driver is not responsible for purchasing and installing the navigator. The penalty for the driver is obviously a law enforcement officer maliciously enforcing the law, and the illegal law enforcement should be severely sanctioned; but if the law enforcement officer has sufficient evidence to prove that the driver deliberately blocked or damaged , Then it’s purely deserved not to commit suicide. . But there is a problem here, whether the quality of the truck navigator is really as poor as stated on the Internet. If it is true, it is the responsibility of the entire supervisory authority and the navigator manufacturer, and it is also a criminal liability. For such a big matter, the quality of the navigator is so poor, but the relevant departments are indifferent. Manufacturers producing inferior products are suspected of endangering public safety, and the drivers are innocent. These people should accept legal sanctions. Responsibilities must be clear, and mixing water is useless.

sina156
6 months ago

First, collate and compare the responses of all parties. First post the regulations “Hebei Province Road Transport Regulations”: Article 57 In violation of these regulations, unauthorized removal of the electronic signs of road transport operating vehicles shall be ordered by the traffic management department of the public security organs of the people’s government at or above the county level where the owner of the vehicle is located Corrections within a time limit shall be imposed a fine of not less than 2,000 yuan but not more than 5,000 yuan; if the satellite positioning terminal equipment is shut down without authorization or the signal of the satellite positioning terminal equipment is blocked, the road transportation management agency at or above the county level shall order the correction within a time limit and impose a penalty of 2,000 yuan to 5,000 yuan The following is fine. Official response: [Investigation on the death of a truck driver using pesticides disclosed in Tangshan] Driver to take this drug on April 5, 2021. The truck driver Jin Deqiang took the drug in Tangshan’s Fengrun District. The reporter learned from the Tangshan city government that on April 5, 2021, the truck driver Jin Deqiang took the drug After the pesticide death incident, Tangshan City immediately formed a joint investigation team with the participation of public security, disciplinary inspection, transportation, health, and judicial departments, and conducted in-depth investigations in accordance with laws and regulations. It is reported that on April 5, Jin Deqiang drove a truck into the guard box at the Zhichao Station in Jiangjiaying, Fengrun District, to undergo a joint road police inspection. Law enforcement officers found that the truck’s Beidou positioning system was not operating online and was suspected of violating relevant road transportation regulations. They guided the vehicle to the Zhichao Station for suspension in accordance with the law, and informed Jin Deqiang to go to the Zhichao Station License Office for further verification. Jin Deqiang did not go to the license room for verification immediately, but left the scene on his own. After investigation, it was discovered that he went to a nearby supply and marketing agency to buy pesticides, and returned to the Supermarket Control Station to consult the illegal behavior penalty standard at the license office window. According to the “Hebei Province Road Transport Regulations”, the staff told him that similar illegal cases were fined 2,000 yuan after verification. During the consultation period, no punishment has been implemented, neither party has excessive words or deeds, nor has any verbal or physical conflicts occurred. Without warning, he took out the pre-purchased pesticide from his pants pocket and drank it quickly. After the staff of the license office discovered that the unknown liquid that Jin Deqiang drank was pesticide, they called the police and dialed the emergency number 120. The people present immediately rushed him to the hospital, where the hospital tried its best to rescue him, but the treatment failed. Combined with the hospital’s clinical examination and diagnosis, the public security agency determined that Jin Deqiang committed suicide by taking a large dose of “Di Cao Kuai” pesticide, and his family had no objection to this. After the incident, relevant departments of Tangshan City accompanied the family members to the site of the incident to view the entire video data, truthfully informed the family members of the investigation results of the public security organs and relevant departments, and assisted the family members in handling the aftermath in a timely manner. (Bohai News Network) [Edit | Wang Wei] An overview of the official response is that the Beidou positioning system for trucks is not operating online. Suspend the vehicle and inform Jin to accept further verification. Jin left the scene on his own and went to a nearby supply and marketing agency to buy pesticides. Jin returned to Zhichao Station and went to the license office window to consult the punishment standards for illegal acts. According to the “Hebei Province Road Transport Regulations”, the staff told him that similar illegal cases were fined 2,000 yuan after verification. During the consultation period, no punishment has been implemented.

yahoo898
6 months ago

The Ministry of Communications, the Ministry of Public Security and the State Administration of Work Safety jointly formulated the “Measures for the Dynamic Supervision and Administration of Road Transport Vehicles”, in which Article 37 violates the provisions of these Measures, and road transport operators fail to maintain online transportation using satellite positioning devices. Where a vehicle is engaged in business activities, the road transport management agency at or above the county level shall order it to make corrections. Those who refuse to make corrections shall be fined 800 yuan. Article 38 In violation of the provisions of these Measures, one of the following circumstances shall be ordered by the road transport management agency at or above the county level to make corrections, and a fine of not less than 2,000 yuan but not more than 5,000 yuan shall be imposed: (1) Damage to the satellite positioning device and malicious human interference, Shielding satellite positioning device signals; (2) Forging, tampering with, or deleting vehicle dynamic monitoring data. Except for one hot comment, they all said that they were punished in accordance with the law. Not to mention the official announcement of the actual situation that has not been implemented. From the official announcement, the driver consulted the penalty situation and replied that similar cases were fined two thousand. There are two possibilities. One is basically no matter how long you are offline, do you know the situation of the offline, as long as the offline is considered malicious or forgery, so you will be fined two thousand if you are offline. Another possibility is that the checkpoint has learned that the driver’s system has been offline for a long time. Normally, this system is to remind you not to drive fatigued or behave badly. After being offline for a few months, no reminder appears. The checkpoint considers this possibility. The sex is relatively low, thinking that the driver should be aware that the system is offline, aware or aware that the system is offline, but did not take action to repair or report upward, so it is deemed intentional. Based on this, similar cases are fined two thousand. If it is the second possibility, it is still a bit different from the punishment that is not actually implemented according to the law. If it is the first case, regardless of whether it is indiscriminately, a direct fine of two thousand is imposed. Which law is based on? The reason why the use of public power must be particularly cautious, especially in accordance with the law, is that the impact is so great that it is unpredictable. What’s more, serving the people is the basis of our country’s public power. Forget this, and make the exercise of public power like doing business. , Only paying attention to fines and only talking about indicators, that is turning the cart before the horse. In addition, since this so-called Beidou box has so many ills, it is intended to prevent drivers from driving fatigued, but it has become a burden for drivers, should the related industries be rectified? Since marketization is not good, should supervision keep up? Is the national team going into the field? Regardless of the truth, a life has passed away, and a tragedy has occurred. The official response seems to be a little thin. Is there any online statement that the punishment is too big and the punishment is for the indicator? Just saying that this has not been punished, I am afraid it is not enough to respond to public concerns.

leexin
6 months ago

The staff is not at fault in punishing him in accordance with the law. The two thousand yuan is the last straw that crushes him. Beneath the tip of the iceberg is the long-term psychological and physiological pressures. The psychological problems of truck drivers need to be increased. Attention, more warmth, maybe he will not choose this dead end!

greatword
6 months ago

At this time, the people above the temple should feel nervous. The grass-roots officials pushed the problem away. Where is the sympathy of the grassroots officials for such a tragic suicide note? Where is empathy? Where is the basic party spirit of sharing a common destiny? It’s fine if you don’t see it. Actually still be innocent, pretend to be naive! Like idiots and lunatics, the people at the bottom who committed suicide by taking drugs are over-emotional, well-prepared and self-defeating. It seems to be well-organized and stable, but in fact something went wrong. But the source of the problem could not be found. How many endless humiliations did the tragic suicide method and last words contain? Who will vent their anger for them? To whom do they tell their grievances? Let’s take a look at those hundreds of thousands and millions of big V who knows how to make a statement, ignoring the difficulties of the people’s livelihood. After reading their remarks, there is always a kind of mental problem that cannot understand the world like them. Obviously life pressure, environmental pressure is very high, the future prospects are simply impossible to predict. But they used win and victory as the key words all day long to draw a wonderful scene in the world. Respect people’s most basic feelings. If you feel unhappy, unhappy, that must be the reason. Even if the number of patients with depression in a society exceeds that in other regions, it can only explain the reason for this society. It cannot be said that the society is normal, and you will feel abnormal only when you are depressed. People live a breath, but how many people live so humiliatingly. why is that!

loveyou
6 months ago

The first thing I thought about this incident was the new “Administrative Punishment Law.” If the party has evidence to prove that there is no subjective fault, no administrative punishment will be imposed. If it is at the fault of others, and if you are not at fault, you should not be punished. I have been following this incident, and this notification popped up on my mobile phone. The first time I went to the official website of the Tangshan Municipal People’s Government of the party concerned, unfortunately, there was no news on the official website. For the public and the drivers themselves, what is most needed is an incident investigation report detailing the process, especially the investigation and evidence collection of law enforcement agencies and the process of imposing punishments. At present, the key word of the draft is that the penalty has not been implemented. What evidence did the law enforcement agencies have in the entire process to prove that the driver was suspected of shutting down the device, and whether it was shut down deliberately or the device itself malfunctioned. In addition, if the punishment has not yet been imposed, whether the case has not yet been opened, or has been filed and is under investigation, or whether the investigation has been completed and the notification of violations is served. We have not seen these. The key information I mentioned above hopes to see the results later. Of course, the key information can be proved, and the most important thing must be the law enforcement recorder or other audio and video records. Article 4 of the “Provisions for On-site Law Enforcement of Video and Audio Recording by Public Security Organs” stipulates that violations of road traffic safety management and other illegal and criminal activities found in on-site interrogation, inspection and daily work shall be dealt with on the spot, and on-site punishment shall be recorded in five situations. Article 6. The whole process of law enforcement shall be recorded uninterruptedly.

strongman
6 months ago

He is so old that he can’t get 2,000 yuan. This kind of person who doesn’t work hard, does not check his own problems, and actually runs to the government office? Does this blame the government? . This can only blame him for not working hard enough! ! ! With the money to buy paraquat, there is no fine of 2,000 yuan? Does this make sense? It is recommended that the relevant departments continue to investigate further, whether there are overseas forces planning and participating, and even instigating the driver to launch such a frenzied attack on the state organs, and all relevant people with ulterior motives should be caught!

stockin
6 months ago

The details of the key content are basically not disclosed. The entire bulletin only appeared on April 5th, and nothing else was mentioned. We don’t need to publish the video. At least we will publish the following details to dispel public doubts: the time the truck pits, the time it was seized, the time the owner negotiated with the staff, how long the negotiation took, the time for drinking pesticides, and the staff found that they were drinking. Medicine time, alarm and report 120 time. Only by publishing these time points can the authenticity of the notification be confirmed.

11
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x