Today (April 9), more than 70 film and television media units and enterprises issued a joint statement on the protection of film and television copyrights, stating that they will conduct unauthorized editing, cutting, and editing of the contents of film and television works by producers and operators of public accounts currently appearing on the Internet. Conveyance, dissemination, etc., will initiate centralized and necessary legal rights protection actions; call on short video platforms and public account producers and operators to earnestly raise their awareness of copyright protection. The statement stated that purifying and optimizing the copyright environment for producers and operators of short video platforms and official accounts, and forming a good industry ecology of “authorize before use” is an important part of strengthening the rule of law and realizing the strategy of strengthening the country.
Considering that some people may not see the end, let’s put the point of view first: I personally think that authorization is supported, but monopolizing traffic in the name of authorization is problematic. I didn’t intend to answer it, but I have an assumption and I don’t know. No, it’s just that this file may be useless…Because where there is change, there will be business. I want to make an assumption. Will anyone make money by authorization in the future? “Get the xxx copyright for a price of 1,000?” “The transaction price of 10,000, MCN will be used forever?” “Double Eleven, the free license is limited to 100 people, come grab it.” Then a film and television company saw this situation, I just thought, we will authorize all for free (or just 0.01 yuan), let the majority of up owners help us to create a second creation, and then there are new film and television works that indicate that we do not sign any platform, we will authorize it to the general public, you can rest assured that the second creation, Take it, even if we are on the platform, the authorization is all free. Everyone sees that it is free, so we will rob and create a second creation. This work will achieve a better publicity effect, and other works will be jealous, and we will ask for authorization. It’s also free, so everyone is vying to go to Second Creation again. Perhaps some head video software such as iQiyi and Mango wanted to sue these film and television companies, but they were overturned by the voice of the general public. Immediately after everyone found that this free authorization thing was done by people, then I did it, so more and more free authorization… So this file became a piece of waste paper… As soon as the news came out, I went to ask a question on Tencent A senior in the video asked him what he thought of this matter… He said that regardless of the industry, he also suffered. I asked why? He said that their workload may increase. Remember that the disappearance of things does not mean that the needs will disappear. Those who edit videos to this website will be asked to make more videos to meet everyone’s needs, including ghosts and animals. The purpose of is to retain and increase the audience, so that they will only go to the corresponding app to watch the Erchuang video. He also said that their colleagues are discussing, afterwards, many people may come to them for the copyright of the variety show, and then there will still be ” x copyright partners, bring you the latest interpretation”, this kind of changing direction may increase…so the meat will always be the head, and many small ups who want to mix and edit the film and television may survive the pressure further. Because of this situation, as a film and television er, I feel sorry for the first time that the video bloggers and marketing accounts in the film and television area… The document mentions purifying the short video environment. Rather, it was a slash. I believe you have definitely seen this kind of whole clip after opening Baidu. I can make 50 clips a day. But you said that this unskilled job is someone who sees someone likes it. ? Really! Some people just want to revisit the clips of these movies they have watched when they are bored, so people actually watch them. But what will happen to this in the future? It will become that every segment seems to be marketing and advertising. I hope you look at it soon. Because they are all officially authorized, most of them have a bit of profit pursuit. Then let’s talk about the up-hosts of the film and television area. If there is no picture, how they explain it will become a person talking in the picture, and we will look at the person’s face. For tens of minutes, I might not be able to watch it anyway, and finally there was a picture with a picture. It turned out that it was an advertisement at the end. The film was actually very ordinary, but he was blown to the sky because he is an authorizer and a good fan. People… But at the same time, this is also a way to protect the IP of the film, because although authorization may seem useless, it actually means that you are allowed to create a second creation. Is the second creation to make money? (Well, some are indeed.) But from the perspective of film and television, it is a more entertaining propaganda, a kind of communication. So I support changing to authorization, but if “authorization” becomes a way for several video sites to monopolize traffic, then I disagree. Therefore, based on my immature ideas above, I hope that my top ideas will be realized and nothing more.