After taking hair follicles from the back of the head and transplanting 4,500 units of hair follicles from Guangzhou Beisheng Medical for hair transplantation costing more than 20,000 yuan and undergoing more than 10 hours of surgery, Guangzhou boy Li Cheng (pseudonym) thought he had finally solved the problem of “defeat” for many years.
However, 11 months after the hair transplant, he found that the top of his head was still sparse, and there was still an “empty” under the sun.
After repeated unsuccessful negotiations, Li Cheng took the other party to court. Since there is no appraisal agency to appraise the survival rate of hair transplanted hair follicles, Li Cheng, who lacks evidence, lost the case.
Li Cheng loses lawsuit against Beisheng hair transplant organization
In response, Guangzhou Beisheng Hair Transplant responded that there is no absolute standard for hair transplant surgery. Generally, the condition after hair transplantation is improved compared with that before surgery, and the hair transplant surgery can be considered as successful. “The survival rate of tangled hair follicles is of little significance.”
The on-site staff took photos of Li Cheng nearly 11 months after the hair transplant, showing that the amount of hair on the top of the head increased significantly, which proves the success of the hair transplant operation, but Li Cheng believes that the other party deliberately dimmed the camera exposure during the shooting to make the top of the head look more It’s dark, but under the natural light and indoor lighting, the overhead of my head is obviously still relatively empty. The two sides held different opinions and failed to reach an agreement.
Judging from the full text and the subject’s own answers, I did not find that the subject appealed, nor did I know the specific follow-up, nor did I know the subject’s thoughts. The current medical cosmetology industry can say that the contract and supporting agreements have been quite perfect under the review of professional lawyers. If such agreements are signed and the terms or paragraphs are ambiguous or obviously biased towards the medical institution, consumers It’s easy to fall into passiveness. A friend of mine was asked to go to a certain medical beauty institution in Hangzhou to perform face-lifting needles and some items. The value is about 50,000 yuan. Before signing, she sent me the contract, that is, after reading the contract, I insisted on the request. She gave up immediately, because the words that appeared in the description probably stated that if the patient’s own skin sensitivity or the result of the operation is not due to the technical reasons, the institution will not be liable for any breach of contract or tort. In the end she gave up. In fact, at that time, it was said that her face was ready to start work. For this case, the situation is almost the same as that of my friend. They are all caught in a pit in the contract, and this pit can’t be crawled out after getting in. My idea is not to entangle the survival rate of hair follicles. If the appeal is still aimed at this point, it will still lose.