On the 17th local time, the BBC program invited Luo Guancong, a Hong Kong disruptor, and Gao Zhikai, an expert on international relations in China, to discuss Hong Kong issues. Luo Guancong declared that the violent demonstrations in Hong Kong were “peaceful” and stated that the British government should withdraw the British judges in Hong Kong and sanction Hong Kong officials. Gao Zhikai “full firepower” and continuously “output”, Luo Guancong once showed fear and nervous smile. (Haike News)
The BBC openly let Luo Guancong appear as a guest on the show and invited Chinese scholars to have a conversation. What is this called, this is called riding on your face and shit. Some people say, ah, when you talk about a fugitive from a political asylum, this will only make people feel funny and get caught in the trap. They want this effect. I’m sorry, whether it’s funny or not is based on strength. The same sentence: The United States is not qualified to speak to China from its position of strength. The mainstream media across the United States were quiet about this. If the North Koreans said this, it is estimated that the news talk show in the United States can be played for a week in the next second. Then you ask Blinken why he doesn’t laugh? If Luo Guancong is going to CNN, maybe we are going to say it differently, BBC, please, what are you in Britain, do you want to point at the Chinese nose to curse? Are you an American wild dad? I think the Chinese must not simply understand the West as a whole, otherwise they will seriously misjudge the strength of the other side. The United States is the United States, the European Union is the European Union, and the United Kingdom is the United Kingdom. Is it possible that the United Kingdom intends to become the world’s third pole with China and the United States? You, the BBC, have not been honest since 19 years. They have been involved in the China issue. You have the Hong Kong issue and you have the Xinjiang issue. CNN is not as active as you. Is it possible that the Democratic Party has also entered your British shares? So the question is how to make Britain understand that he does not have the natural right to dictate to China? The best way is to go straight and straight. It is a strength hedge. You are a fugitive or a fugitive. What kind of language skills and diplomatic rhetoric? Do we still need to consider the feelings of the British? How fresh is it? Only when Britain felt the pain under this kind of pure power oppression, can he recall the fear of being dominated by the Soviet Union and understand what the battlefield of the superpower is. In the show, Luo Guancong’s expression was obviously wrong when he heard what the Chinese scholar said. It was neither sarcasm nor anger but nervousness. The words of the Chinese scholar greatly exceeded Luo’s expectations and stimulated his nerves: How long can Britain protect him? ten years? Twenty years? If China continues to rise, where will he be truly safe? How long can he keep everything he got now? Does he really understand the government he wants to challenge? Luo Guancong is a fugitive, and a fugitive is a fugitive. What can I explain to you? Back then, the United States used laundry detergent to kill the whole family. I am willing to tell you the truth and it is the kingly way. Believe it or not, what if you don’t?