At 9 am on April 19, Sixi, a 3-year-old girl with her mother-in-law in the Fourth Hospital of Jiangyou City, Sichuan, was suddenly picked up by a 56-year-old man, Zhang, and fell heavily to the ground three times in a row. In the afternoon, the doctor said that Xixi had a comminuted skull fracture and was undergoing further treatment in the ICU. On the afternoon of the 19th, the reporter learned from Jiangyou police that Zhang had been detained on suspicion of intentional murder.
It is understood that on April 17, the girl’s mother-in-law, Aunt Jiang and Zhang, played mahjong, and the two had a dispute. Aunt Jiang was injured and hospitalized. On the morning of the 19th, the two quarreled again in the ward over medical expenses. “Zhang said that she had no money and wanted to kill us.” Aunt Jiang said. Before she could react, Zhang picked up her granddaughter who was resting in the hospital bed and fell directly to the ground. Aunt Yang, who was in the same ward as Aunt Jiang, introduced that she heard a “bang” at the time, thinking that something had fallen over, and then heard the cry of the little girl. She turned her head to see, and Zhang picked up the little girl again. Fell to the ground. Aunt Jiang went to grab her granddaughter, but Zhang picked up Xixi and went to the corridor outside the ward, and fell again.
According to Xixi’s attending physician, after preliminary examination, Xixi had a comminuted skull fracture, but there was less bleeding, and surgery was not required for the time being. “We will take Xixi to review to see if there is delayed bleeding in the skull. If there is more bleeding, it will be life-threatening. If there is less bleeding, I hope it will be more serious.” The doctor said that the specific condition will be evaluated after the review.
There is no problem with the police filing a crime, this guy is intentional murder. Judging from the performance before the engagement, the man has already expressed the intention to “kill the other party”. Although the pure intent means that he cannot be punished, it can be used as a factual basis for proving his subjective intention to kill. In terms of performance, the man did not only fall once, but fell three times in a row. The injury was on the head and other parts that were prone to death, and he took the child out of the ward and hit it after his family found it. It was discovered that the child did not fall to death and continued the assault. The post-event performance is currently unknown, and it is unknown why the man stopped the assault. Combining the above two perspectives, I agree that men are intentional to kill rather than intentional to hurt. From the perspective of the consequences, the victim had a comminuted skull fracture and has been admitted to the intensive care unit. If the rescue is not in time, the results can be imagined, which is enough to prove that the man’s behavior has caused a serious threat to the victim’s life. Even if the victim is out of danger after the subsequent rescue, it is still a failure to succeed due to reasons other than the will. The man constitutes an attempted homicide (I am praying here for such a result, I hope the child can survive it) does not cause harm to his wife and children, and the child is There is no fault. For this kind of villain who takes a child’s anger, the so-called compensation dispute cannot be used as a light reason for discretion, and must be severely punished!