Suggest several things for Tesla: 1. Anyway, personal driving data is private, and users have the right to know their own data. Tesla can get through the relationship between this layer and the app. Every time a driving cycle, users can see the driving data returned by Tesla in real time from the background. There is no problem of tampering or giving or not in this process, so there are many problems. That’s not a problem. Those who are clean are self-cleaning, where do they need to prove their innocence? 2. As for installing a few more cameras in the car, that is another matter. Either it is recommended to move the camera in the car that monitors the driver’s status to the top of the driver’s head or the position of the armrest box to take pictures of the user’s driving process. This consideration is: Anyway, everyone does not want Tesla to monitor their privacy. You should not take pictures of what I did in the car. Anyway, now everyone wants to prove their innocence. It is better to take pictures of me. 3. No longer publicizing “autonomous driving” and changing to “driving assistance, the driver must bear the corresponding responsibility” to prevent individual users from misjudging the actual situation, and avoid L2 automatic driving being forcibly applied to the L5 scene by users and causing failure The word-of-mouth problem that followed. 4. The development process does not have to be AUTOSAR or 26262, but it is necessary to re-examine the vehicle development process, treat software development more cautiously, release functions more cautiously, and verify more cautiously, instead of “new” for the sake of “new”. And to cherish the lives of users more. The phone can be replaced if it is broken, the car is broken, and there is only one life. 5. Cancel the FSD payment function, push the full FSD function to users who have purchased Tesla and prompt “FSD Full self driving is just a vision, not a true fully automatic driving. Pushing these functions only helps to improve the user experience, please do not Over-reliance”, for subsequent users, users who do not need to purchase FSD functions will perform hardware reduction, and users will no longer be allowed to pay for hardware for functions that “do not need, do not want to buy”. I understand these functions. Software and hardware are matched together. If I don’t need FSD, I don’t need software or hardware. If I have to pay for the hardware, it is a strong buy and sell. This is mainly used to improve the existing user experience and provide a choice for subsequent users.