The Shaanxi Provincial Party Committee and the Provincial Government attached great importance to it. On the evening of April 23, an inspection team was dispatched to conduct an on-site inspection, and three special meetings were held to listen to the inspection report, and study in-depth investigation and resolution of related issues. After several days of field inspections, the report revealed that the five-guarantee households in the two villages had implemented centralized support or decentralized support policies and measures before they took off their hats and withdrew. The people involved solved the housing safety by relying on relatives and friends and renovating dilapidated houses. The problem is that the drinking water safety of the two villages is solved through tap water, wells, and water cellars. The exit of the two poverty alleviation villages and poverty alleviation households met the national and Shaanxi Province standards of “two no worries and three guarantees”, and the exit procedures met the requirements. However, problems such as low levels of safe drinking water protection, seasonal water shortages, low levels of management and protection, and lax and untruthful cadres’ style do exist.
Our province will do a good job in the follow-up work and take the opportunity of accepting media supervision to further draw inferences from one another, improve work style, and continuously consolidate the results of poverty alleviation.
Shaanxi Provincial Government Information Office
April 26, 2021
According to CCTV Finance Channel, Luonan County in Shaanxi Province was once a national-level poverty-stricken county, and it will withdraw from the poverty-stricken counties in February 2020. In accordance with the requirements of poverty alleviation, the village needs to centrally resettle the five-guarantee households who are unable to work and have no source of livelihood. However, now, the five-guarantee households who could have lived in the resettlement site have to find a place to live on their own, and the reporter launched an investigation.
it is good! Let me talk about an experience a few years ago when I was selected as an acceptance test for poverty alleviation during my undergraduate period. Let me start with the conclusion. The poverty alleviation efforts are worthy of recognition. Money is indeed sent to poor households, dilapidated houses are renovated, and every household has tap water. The efforts of the grassroots personnel are also commendable, but the implementation of poverty alleviation is a bit inverted. The poverty alleviation in response to inspections is not consistent with the goal of poverty alleviation work. The following will only talk about the problems I encountered. Checking the poverty alleviation situation at home, all the old men and uncles answered very neatly, and many people remembered the time and amount of each subsidy very accurately. For poverty alleviation industries, such as breeding, just ask, “The government-subsidized breeding X is only X written in the book, can you take us to take a look?”? Most of the answers received were, “It has been sold; it has been sold; I just sold it recently. You see, I raised ducks in this pond before.” At first, it didn’t feel abnormal. After the inspection work started for half a day, I felt something was wrong, so I added it a bit. Pay attention. A rough estimate is that most of the farmers’ poverty alleviation manuals include breeding for poverty alleviation, but during the inspection time of three or four days, my teammates and I only encountered poverty alleviation households raising livestock and poultry in their homes, and they might be able to count them with one hand. Those of us who have been assigned to check on poverty alleviation work seem to be Ministers of Qincha. Stay in a local four-star hotel at night, and go to the township to eat at the town government during the day. Feel free to say that this dish is delicious when you eat, then there must be this dish next time (generally, the dish is not repeated every time). The mayor and secretary deliver cigarettes at the lowest price in China, with a price of 90 or 100 (not to mention the brand, otherwise the exposure is a province) a lot of cigarettes. The phenomenon of giving gifts is very common. As long as there is a little error in the inspection process (such as the inconsistency between the answer of the poverty alleviation household and the record in the poverty alleviation manual), you will understand what will happen later. PS: I have never seen a dog in the village. Later, I heard that in order to welcome the inspection, all households were required to leash their dogs at home; because a team found a crack in the wall of a resident’s house during the inspection and pointed out that it was not in compliance with housing safety. , No dilapidated houses were renovated. That night, the town’s poverty alleviation specialists and cements went from house to house overnight to plug the walls; all townships shared information, and if a problem was found in one place, they would be immediately notified to other towns and rectified themselves immediately.