Warning: sizeof(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/helpmekim2dhsefl3pwmseak8ismo2/wwwroot/wp-content/plugins/ad-injection/ad-injection.php on line 824 Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /home/helpmekim2dhsefl3pwmseak8ismo2/wwwroot/wp-content/plugins/ad-injection/ad-injection.php on line 831

How to treat it, of course it should be so! Many foreign companies have “hidden rules” that the highest-level people pay the bills. I still remember having a private meeting with my former colleagues several years ago. I was going to pay the bill, and was joked by a big brother, “Everyone here, I am the highest level. You will want to pay the bill after a few years of hard work.” Suddenly the store was full Happy air. On the contrary, I still remember that I used to see young children tentatively posting to ask the boss/predecessors to pay money, how to return gracefully, the attitude of impossibility is very bitter. And some “sophisticated” veterans will also educate young people to understand the so-called “eyesight” or “emotional intelligence”, and persuade young people to “suffer a loss is a blessing”, “maybe this is what the boss treats you. The test? See if you are a person who cares too much about gains and losses.” I am not used to persuasion that teaches young people “mature” and “emotional intelligence.” If a boss/superior checks the loyalty of his subordinates by taking advantage of his subordinates, what promise can be made of following such a person. Everyone is here to work, not to be slaves, right? There is natural inequality in interpersonal relationships. For example: the relationship between the superior and the teacher and even the relationship between the predecessors and the younger generations in certain scenarios. From the perspective of this natural asymmetric relationship and the unique interpersonal communication styles of East Asians, it is extremely easy to breed the advantage of the superior party in the interpersonal relationship to the inferior party. . When making an unreasonable request that the other party could not refuse under the circumstances at the time, what is it that you are not bullying others? From the company level, the requirement that the company’s subordinates are not allowed to invite their superiors to eat is to restrict this kind of exploitation from the perspective of cultural systems. From a personal level. If everyone can not forget their original intentions, those who were treated kindly in the rookie period should treat their descendants kindly; those who have been bullied before, treat others kindly, don’t become the kind of person you hate the most.


By zhiwo

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
7 months ago

Very good, this is considered workplace ethics and corporate governance. It not only blocked a way for superiors to want to be corrupt, but also reduced the embarrassment of subordinates about whether they should invite superiors to eat and how much money to eat. Reducing the amount of time spent on these random thoughts can put more energy on business matters. In addition, many large companies will issue some anti-corruption agreements to their executives to sign, just to tell everyone that these things cannot be done in the company, and how to deal with situations that must be favored and so on.

7 months ago

Reimbursement needs to be reviewed and signed by the superior, which is an important part of the enterprise’s expense monitoring method; the expense of the superior needs to be reviewed and monitored by the superior; the subordinate pays the bill and submits it to the superior for his own signature. The essence is that he signs and approves his own expenses. Just bypassing this monitoring link, of course it is a violation. The specific implementation is very simple, that is, the person with the highest position at the dinner table pays the bill (reimbursement, accepts higher-level supervision), and foreign companies with a small scale emphasize this. Such things as digging the corner of capitalism have been seen by capitalists many years ago. Aunt Dong is also crossing the river with capitalism.

7 months ago

Different companies have different habits. It’s not really a fuss. I have a good relationship with my direct leadership in the previous company or in the current company. Especially with the current direct leadership, I know and have a lot of knowledge before coming to the company. I have cooperated for the second time and I have been with the direct leaders of the previous company. Although they have left for several years, they occasionally send messages to each other to greet each other and send small gifts to each other. If it’s because of company activities to go out to eat, then it’s definitely whether it’s the company’s or the leader’s own money. Anyway, it has nothing to do with me, but in private, I will invite the leader to dinner. Actually, it’s not why I get a promotion or a salary increase, I’m just a friend. Nothing more

7 months ago

If everyone went to lunch together, it would definitely be aa. But if it’s a dinner, the boss must pay for it. Even if he asks you to pay, he must take out his card and ask you to pay. Unless you have left the original company, your boss will never let you pay. In fact, even after leaving the original company, he made it clear that he wanted to invite the original boss for dinner, and the boss still often paid the bill. This is not just an institutional issue. This is a question of the character and status of the boss. The boss’s income status is higher than that of the employees. Inviting employees to dinner is sympathetic to the subordinates, and letting the employees pay the bill is to squeeze the subordinates and let the family advance the money. In an industry that values reputation, no boss wants to take risks. When paying the bill, you can indicate that you want to buy, but you must not really buy, otherwise it will embarrass the boss. If your boss really makes you pay, unless he is completely drunk. Otherwise, I only have two words plus a punctuation mark for you: Run!

7 months ago

A company always has superiors and subordinates. No one is always at the top of the food chain. Even the emperor had his childhood. In order to climb up the food chain to obtain more social resources, it is a proper way for subordinates to make small gains as an investment of uncertainty, and to cut into the low-level needs that must be experienced such as food. If it is clear that the subordinates are not allowed to eat, it is possible for the subordinates to climb through other means. What is in the interests of capitalists may be inward competition with each other and increase the company’s interests at the same time. It may also be embarrassing with the superior, colluding with each other to steal the company’s interests. Generally speaking, it depends on the company and the industry.

7 months ago

This shows that the mind is clear. Is the purpose of inviting superiors to eat for the subordinates? What you need to do at work is not just what you call “sensible”, but also not those vain sense of words and colors. The two have a good friendship. After work, you can ask him for a meal. This thing has nothing to do with the superior and the superior. If you have the relationship between the superior and the superior, then don’t fix this. Some superiors feel that their status has risen, and they have to accept these compliments and receive some small benefits. Over time, these have become the so-called unspoken rules of the workplace. I don’t understand, how come this unspoken rule that is obviously wrong has become a matter of course? It’s outrageous. In addition, I also advise newcomers to the workplace, don’t believe in those unspoken rules. All human affection and sophistication are only meaningful on the basis of your ability. There may be opportunities for evil ways, but it does not last long. Don’t worry about paying for yourself, you are very rich. If you want to be really rich, do you still look at his face.

7 months ago

What do you think of Dong Mingzhu’s exposure in “We Who Are New to the Workplace”: The company’s subordinates are not allowed to invite their superiors to eat? Isn’t this “Sister Dong” protecting employees? In some units, the master leads the apprentice, and the apprentice can’t understand some aspects, so the master says “the apprentice’s emotional quotient is too low”…The apprentice here may be a fresh graduate or graduate student. Interns, don’t get much money. If eating and drinking are forbidden, this problem will be solved. Some people who “understand society” or “high emotional intelligence” like that set of relationships and make a profit from it. It shows that Old Dong is very clear.

7 months ago

Seeing that I want to vomit. I had an internship at an Internet company, but when I left my job, I was asked to invite the whole group to dinner? It’s also beautifully called the company’s tradition. How much money did you receive during the internship? I’m a Buddha… It’s only been a few years, everyone wants to go inside the system, and the Internet is no longer the first choice. (From the recruitment of Beijing Post at station b, it can be seen that the high probability is the result of the various bad habits of private enterprises and the values of improper people. Let the fresh graduates vote.

7 months ago

Our company has strict regulations on this aspect: the upper level and the lower level eat, the first can be AA, but the lower level can not exceed 50 yuan/person, the extra part, the upper level fills in. Second, the superiors are all out. If there is a violation, you can report it, and the reporter will be well protected. This one is very fragrant! Because the leader is not willing to eat with us anymore. Others, the wedding bonus cannot exceed 100 per person. It used to be 50. In the past few years, the consumption level has risen, and it has been a little higher. It is very good. Now my colleagues get married and are basically uninvited. They just come back. Every desk has some sweet melon seeds.

7 months ago

In any company with well-regulated management, it should be forbidden for subordinates to invite superiors for dinner. In fact, if you think about it, if subordinates can invite superiors for dinner, it will inevitably lead to internal corruption in the company. I have worked for more than ten years and have experienced various companies. Regardless of domestic and foreign investment, every time you eat with your boss, as long as it is work-related, the boss must pay the bill; if it is a private dinner with colleagues, if there is a boss, then either the boss pays (the boss invites everyone to eat) or everyone is AA. Inviting the boss to dinner, this should obviously be common sense.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x