Zhang Ruoyun formally sued his father Zhang Jian# According to “Corporate” magazine, Zhang Ruoyun recently filed a formal lawsuit against his father Zhang Jian and Zhejiang Nanbei Lake Mengdu Film Co., Ltd. in the Haiyan County Court of Zhejiang Province on the grounds of a contract dispute. The case was opened on April 21. In June last year, after the incident of “Zhang Ruoyun involved in 140 million financial disputes” was exposed, Zhang Ruoyun responded, “I have not signed an agreement and never received any money.”
In 2019, Huace Films filed an arbitration application to the Hangzhou Arbitration Commission, requesting the cancellation of the “cooperation agreement” signed with Mengdu Films and others, requiring Mengdu Films and others to return 144 million yuan in remuneration and liquidated damages, and requiring relevant responsible personnel Take joint and several liability for the above-mentioned debts. Zhang Ruoyun once filed a jurisdictional objection to the Hangzhou Arbitration Commission, but it was rejected in September 2019. After that, Zhang Ruoyun applied to the court twice to confirm that the Hangzhou Arbitration Commission had no jurisdiction over him because his signature in the Cooperation Agreement was forged, but both applications were rejected by the court. The most recent dismissal was the ruling made by Zhejiang Higher People’s Court in January 2021. After the two applications were rejected by the court, Zhang Ruoyun recently filed a lawsuit on the grounds of disputes over the entrustment contract. Zhang Ruoyun’s father, Zhang Jian, stated that Zhang Ruoyun’s performance fees and other matters in the “Cooperation Agreement” were authorized by Zhang Ruoyun and Mengdu Company to negotiate, confirm and sign through WeChat; Zhang Ruoyun did not autograph the cooperation agreement involved, but rather Stamped with Zhang Ruoyun’s signature and seal, the agreement is flawed.
This is a litigation method, a case within a case. Xiao Zhang wants to use this victory verdict as a “must kill” evidence for another case. Huace Pictures requested the cancellation of the “cooperation agreement signed with Mengdu Films, etc. and required Mengdu Films to return 144 million yuan in remuneration and liquidated damages, and at the same time require the relevant responsible personnel to bear joint and several liabilities-this type of case is based on the rules of evidence and probability In the above, the defendant (respondent) is not easy to fight. Because of this, Xiao Zhang sued Lao Zhang to invalidate the so-called entrustment between the two fathers and sons-if Xiao Zhang wins the case, then Xiao Zhang will use this winning judgment as evidence and get it from Huace Pictures and In the arbitration case of Mengdu Pictures, the arbitrator told the arbitrator: “Here is a court effective judgment, ruling that the entrustment between me and Lao Zhang is invalid, so I am not liable in your case!”-If Xiao Zhang has this winning judgment, then the arbitrators who tried Huace Films and Mengdu Films must recognize the fact that the commission is invalid, because the facts determined by the court’s effective judgment must be recognized in principle, and the arbitrators cannot make the opposite. Confirmation and opinion. Therefore, this lawsuit is not really Xiao Zhang suing Lao Zhang, this is Xiao Zhang’s method of obtaining evidence-if Xiao Zhang wins the case, Lao Zhang will not appeal, and the judgment will take effect 15 days after the judgment is made-Xiao Zhang wants Let the winning judgment take effect as soon as possible, before the arbitration tribunal makes a ruling. Therefore, Huace Pictures will definitely obstruct this case in every possible way, or strongly urge to participate in this case, so as not to let Xiao Zhang win the case. If the news has more information, we will talk again. Interested friends are welcome to discuss.