I bought a lot of ergo many years ago, and I also asked someone to update the design draft of the ergo community. As a senior programmer and writer, I fully understand the benefits of this keyboard. But at the same time, as the former president of a 3C volume product brand, I know that this product is far from the level of a standard commercial product. No real 21st century materials and surface treatment techniques were used, the most advanced wireless technology today, and no adequate professional industrial design. In order to verify the most ideal prototype, I used 3D printing resin and optional Bluetooth chip to make the first working version of this keyboard. About two years ago? Yes, in order to verify the wireless solution, I used the open source of dactyl posted below to temporarily replace it. I played the rest two years ago. And hatsu, every curve of his is different from him, because we drew it from scratch. It also loses money. Although it has verified the possibility of a wireless, split, and three-dimensional keyboard, it has not promoted mass production. The reason is simple. R&D investment is too high and production is too difficult. This product is almost destined to lose money. Cyberboard succeeded and then angrymiao was established. It could be used as a hatsu keyboard, but it is too expensive and too niche. Therefore, first made a relatively popular cyberboard, which is also much cheaper. At the same time, the aluminum alloy material, surface treatment, wireless technology, and the ability to control complex shapes have all been improved. Moreover, more cash has been accumulated. With the money and team, hastu finally decided to be willful and really upgrade the manual ergo to a commercial product that can be mass-produced. During the period, I learned from various shapes in the history of ergo and made countless editions of adjustments. In the end, the basic pattern of high up and low down, high inside and low outside was chosen. Then, the entire shape and structure were redesigned by industrial design. The contrast structure of the internal and external dismantling parts produced a very good effect. This is thanks to the feeling of Western World. You know, for the convenience of printing and assembly, the three-dimensional ergo is rarely designed to disassemble. Moreover, we must also consider harmony with our existing products. In the end, the design became like this. And I am very pleased that the global order exceeded 100 of this design in a few minutes. It is blind to say that the plagiarism is. In the pasted keyboard, all the keys are still on the same plane. Some stereo keyboards copy non-stereo keyboards. . Do you need me to give you a dactyl first to learn the history of the evolution of the split keyboard? Chinese brands, selling tens of thousands of the world’s top prices, rely on original designs. Regardless of cb or hatu, the adjustment of the entire body, the verification of the structure, and the time of repeated sampling are all about one year. Moreover, consumers around the world are also supporting our design and innovation with very high prices. My ergo, dactly no less than 10, is not enough compared to hatsu. Tucao, I would like to know if you have ergo in your hand and whether you have actually used it. The Chinese can be the most expensive brand in the world. Moreover, it is the most expensive brand in the world relying on the leading design and technology. Maybe the keyboard is a small track, but our two products really prove it. And it often accuses OPPO of copying iPhone, do we copy someone else’s keyboard man? Can you lift your knees from the ground first, stand up straight and look at the world? Hey, let me popularize the history of split keyboards. In the current answer, I really haven’t seen the real Gaowan. Not to mention professional products, design, structure and embedded. For the ergodox holding a full plane, I hatsu plagiarism people, I am speechless. I have no fewer than ten split keyboards, and they were all abandoned at least two years ago. Ergodox is one of the more famous ones. Derived a variety of shapes and arrangements. And this one, whether it was bought from Finland or where, is already considered the best in the plane split. kinesis is available on Jingdong, so I won’t discuss it anymore. I also have dactyl, which is equal to the split version of kinesis. dactyl manuform, equal to the reverse three-dimensional version of dactyl, grip. I also have several. There are too many people who can only talk, and even talking is not good for research. All of these are not like hatsu. There is something more similar, this is it. This is a derivative version of dactyl manu, which is easy to search. I am anxious for those who get excited when they see ergodox or dactyl. You can’t be dedicated to searching for pictures. Can anyone really do some research here, really use a few ergo, and really 3d print a dactyl. We are people who really want to be a 3D split wireless keyboard that represents the future. Of course all these keyboards have been played. And we have played with keyboards that you may not have seen at all. For example, dactyl manuform actually has a conjoined version. For example, if you find a photo with a camouflage water transfer, then it is probably my 3D resin proofing two years ago. Don’t get excited when you see it. If you accidentally use the products I verified to prove my plagiarism, it will be embarrassing. If you actually print out that dactyl manu derivative, you will find that the figure I gave you is actually not like hatsu at all. Because first, when you put them together, you know that the scale is not the same. That derivative version is too big to hold by ordinary hands. Cantaloupe copied watermelon. Second, that version is integrated without disassembly. This integrated version is only for printing convenience but not exquisite. The overall structure and shape is not a train of thought at all. One is the probability test, and the other is the language test. They plagiarize each other. Third, if you simply reverse it, you will know that there is no internal design at all, only flying wires. And how can commodity-level products fly? In order to accommodate the chip, the combination of hardware and software, and the power supply, a lot of design must be done on the internal structure. This version does not have it at all. An industrial-grade sample that can work intact, plagiarize a version that has nothing in it, copy air? There are too many people talking, and too few people actually create and experience products. Tell stories with screenshots of various web pages. I don’t even bother to take a picture of a whole lot of things. But at least it can be guaranteed that in this answer, all photos are taken in kind or rendered by my own team, and no network screenshots are required. The wireless solution and the wireless solution, the Bluetooth solution on github, are basically unreliable. The most reliable is that I used the dactyl manu body to make a prototype of the tws bluetooth film I purchased. And what I like better is the 2.4 dual-engine plan made by another Chinese called Sirius. Not only did I do two, but I also wrote chh’s homepage article for him. e, it was also two years ago; but these are not the level of commercial products, nor are they plans for mass production. By the way, qmk is not industrial grade either. Not many people understand it anyway. It is precisely because we tried all the solutions that we were forced to design from the beginning hatsu will definitely refer to various split keyboards in history. And the reference is not to search for pictures. I have all these keyboards. And many keyboards are 3D printed resin and assembled by themselves. However, every curve of hatsu is redrawn. The wireless solution is also redesigned. They are all mobile-level teams, which are made in accordance with the standards of commercial products. If you say which one of our products most resembles? So it is precisely the derivative version of dactyl manu that we have proofed, but none of the keyboard guys at talking have seen. But that’s just like it, it’s different from what I said before. If it is too professional, then the example is that the iPhone 12 is also like the Meizu Blue flagship that I leaked earlier that year. But that is not plagiarism. Independent research and development, thinking, and structure are different, it looks a bit like it. The development process of the industry, the evolutionary trajectory of all products, of course, the product maker must be clear. If you really are not talking, but have really assembled, tested and analyzed like me, you know that hatsu is a brand new design after considering all the products in the history of split keyboards. As for craftsmanship, wireless technology, disassembly, PCB craftsmanship, software standards, testing and quality? It is completely beyond the previous manual era. I’m not saying you can’t be ignorant. But when making negative accusations, please make a somewhat correct assessment of your own level. We have done more than a dozen split keyboards, modified Bluetooth solutions, and committed physical modifications for the open source community. It’s nothing nb, it should be the product. Designing from scratch, evaluating and designing wireless solutions from scratch, verifying materials and craftsmanship from scratch, using commodity-level inspections, etc., are also guaranteed to sell commercial products. Hatsu Before actually doing it, the various researches in the early stage should be at least one year, and the purchase of ergo The investment in 3D printing and assembly is conservative and there are 100,000. There is nothing to blow up, this is not the most basic homework before making a product. All these contributions do not expect any respect. But at least, it should not be so carelessly searched on the Internet, so unprofessional theoretical level, use a bunch of network screenshots to easily blame.